mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
c924e93ad9
rust/tests/ui/lint/issue-97094.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

54 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
error: unknown lint: `nonex_lint_top_level`
Remove `-Zno-interleave-lints`. Because it complicates lint implementation greatly.
2022-11-24 21:42:43 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-97094.rs:5:26
Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
|
LL | #![cfg_attr(all(), allow(nonex_lint_top_level))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
Remove `-Zno-interleave-lints`. Because it complicates lint implementation greatly.
2022-11-24 21:42:43 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-97094.rs:1:9
Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
|
LL | #![deny(warnings)]
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: `#[deny(unknown_lints)]` implied by `#[deny(warnings)]`
error: lint `bare_trait_object` has been renamed to `bare_trait_objects`
Remove `-Zno-interleave-lints`. Because it complicates lint implementation greatly.
2022-11-24 21:42:43 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-97094.rs:7:26
Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
|
LL | #![cfg_attr(all(), allow(bare_trait_object))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use the new name: `bare_trait_objects`
|
= note: `#[deny(renamed_and_removed_lints)]` implied by `#[deny(warnings)]`
error: unknown lint: `nonex_lint_mod`
Remove `-Zno-interleave-lints`. Because it complicates lint implementation greatly.
2022-11-24 21:42:43 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-97094.rs:10:25
Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
|
LL | #[cfg_attr(all(), allow(nonex_lint_mod))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: unknown lint: `nonex_lint_mod_inner`
Remove `-Zno-interleave-lints`. Because it complicates lint implementation greatly.
2022-11-24 21:42:43 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-97094.rs:13:30
Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
|
LL | #![cfg_attr(all(), allow(nonex_lint_mod_inner))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: unknown lint: `nonex_lint_fn`
Remove `-Zno-interleave-lints`. Because it complicates lint implementation greatly.
2022-11-24 21:42:43 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-97094.rs:17:25
Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
|
LL | #[cfg_attr(all(), allow(nonex_lint_fn))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: unknown lint: `nonex_lint_in_macro`
Remove `-Zno-interleave-lints`. Because it complicates lint implementation greatly.
2022-11-24 21:42:43 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-97094.rs:28:29
Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
|
LL | #[cfg_attr(all(), allow(nonex_lint_in_macro))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: unknown lint: `nonex_lint_fn`
Remove `-Zno-interleave-lints`. Because it complicates lint implementation greatly.
2022-11-24 21:42:43 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-97094.rs:47:13
Emit weird lint name lints after expansion Previously, we were emitting weird name lints (for renamed or unknown lints) before expansion, most importantly before cfg expansion. This meant that the weird name lints would not fire for lint attributes hidden inside cfg_attr. The same applied for lint level specifications of those lints. By moving the lints for the lint names to the post-expansion phase, these issues are resolved.
2022-05-21 21:25:40 -05:00
|
LL | #[allow(nonex_lint_fn)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 7 previous errors
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink