rust/tests/rustdoc-js/path-ordering.rs

pub mod dbbbbb {
    pub struct Ccccccc;
}
pub mod abbbbb {
    pub struct Ccccccc;
}
pub mod bbbbbb {
    pub struct Ccccccc;
}
rustdoc-search: count path edits with separate edit limit Since the two are counted separately elsewhere, they should get their own limits, too. The biggest problem with combining them is that paths are loosely checked by not requiring every component to match, which means that if they are short and matched loosely, they can easily find "drunk typist" matches that make no sense, like this old result: std::collections::btree_map::itermut matching slice::itermut maxEditDistance = ("slice::itermut".length) / 3 = 14 / 3 = 4 editDistance("std", "slice") = 4 editDistance("itermut", "itermut") = 0 4 + 0 <= 4 PASS Of course, `slice::itermut` should not match stuff from btreemap. `slice` should not match `std`. The new result counts them separately: maxPathEditDistance = "slice".length / 3 = 5 / 3 = 1 maxEditDistance = "itermut".length / 3 = 7 / 3 = 2 editDistance("std", "slice") = 4 4 <= 1 FAIL Effectively, this makes path queries less "typo-resistant". It's not zero, but it means `vec` won't match the `v1` prelude. Queries without parent paths are unchanged. 2023-12-26 17:15:51 -06:00			`pub mod dbbbbb {`
rustdoc: search result ranking fix 2022-05-09 13:46:24 -05:00			`pub struct Ccccccc;`
			`}`
rustdoc-search: count path edits with separate edit limit Since the two are counted separately elsewhere, they should get their own limits, too. The biggest problem with combining them is that paths are loosely checked by not requiring every component to match, which means that if they are short and matched loosely, they can easily find "drunk typist" matches that make no sense, like this old result: std::collections::btree_map::itermut matching slice::itermut maxEditDistance = ("slice::itermut".length) / 3 = 14 / 3 = 4 editDistance("std", "slice") = 4 editDistance("itermut", "itermut") = 0 4 + 0 <= 4 PASS Of course, `slice::itermut` should not match stuff from btreemap. `slice` should not match `std`. The new result counts them separately: maxPathEditDistance = "slice".length / 3 = 5 / 3 = 1 maxEditDistance = "itermut".length / 3 = 7 / 3 = 2 editDistance("std", "slice") = 4 4 <= 1 FAIL Effectively, this makes path queries less "typo-resistant". It's not zero, but it means `vec` won't match the `v1` prelude. Queries without parent paths are unchanged. 2023-12-26 17:15:51 -06:00			`pub mod abbbbb {`
rustdoc: search result ranking fix 2022-05-09 13:46:24 -05:00			`pub struct Ccccccc;`
			`}`
rustdoc-search: count path edits with separate edit limit Since the two are counted separately elsewhere, they should get their own limits, too. The biggest problem with combining them is that paths are loosely checked by not requiring every component to match, which means that if they are short and matched loosely, they can easily find "drunk typist" matches that make no sense, like this old result: std::collections::btree_map::itermut matching slice::itermut maxEditDistance = ("slice::itermut".length) / 3 = 14 / 3 = 4 editDistance("std", "slice") = 4 editDistance("itermut", "itermut") = 0 4 + 0 <= 4 PASS Of course, `slice::itermut` should not match stuff from btreemap. `slice` should not match `std`. The new result counts them separately: maxPathEditDistance = "slice".length / 3 = 5 / 3 = 1 maxEditDistance = "itermut".length / 3 = 7 / 3 = 2 editDistance("std", "slice") = 4 4 <= 1 FAIL Effectively, this makes path queries less "typo-resistant". It's not zero, but it means `vec` won't match the `v1` prelude. Queries without parent paths are unchanged. 2023-12-26 17:15:51 -06:00			`pub mod bbbbbb {`
rustdoc: search result ranking fix 2022-05-09 13:46:24 -05:00			`pub struct Ccccccc;`
			`}`