mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
c5db290bf6
rust/src/test/compile-fail/issue-17718-const-destructors.rs

20 lines
614 B
Rust
Raw Normal View History

rustc: Add `const` globals to the language This change is an implementation of [RFC 69][rfc] which adds a third kind of global to the language, `const`. This global is most similar to what the old `static` was, and if you're unsure about what to use then you should use a `const`. The semantics of these three kinds of globals are: * A `const` does not represent a memory location, but only a value. Constants are translated as rvalues, which means that their values are directly inlined at usage location (similar to a #define in C/C++). Constant values are, well, constant, and can not be modified. Any "modification" is actually a modification to a local value on the stack rather than the actual constant itself. Almost all values are allowed inside constants, whether they have interior mutability or not. There are a few minor restrictions listed in the RFC, but they should in general not come up too often. * A `static` now always represents a memory location (unconditionally). Any references to the same `static` are actually a reference to the same memory location. Only values whose types ascribe to `Sync` are allowed in a `static`. This restriction is in place because many threads may access a `static` concurrently. Lifting this restriction (and allowing unsafe access) is a future extension not implemented at this time. * A `static mut` continues to always represent a memory location. All references to a `static mut` continue to be `unsafe`. This is a large breaking change, and many programs will need to be updated accordingly. A summary of the breaking changes is: * Statics may no longer be used in patterns. Statics now always represent a memory location, which can sometimes be modified. To fix code, repurpose the matched-on-`static` to a `const`. static FOO: uint = 4; match n { FOO => { /* ... */ } _ => { /* ... */ } } change this code to: const FOO: uint = 4; match n { FOO => { /* ... */ } _ => { /* ... */ } } * Statics may no longer refer to other statics by value. Due to statics being able to change at runtime, allowing them to reference one another could possibly lead to confusing semantics. If you are in this situation, use a constant initializer instead. Note, however, that statics may reference other statics by address, however. * Statics may no longer be used in constant expressions, such as array lengths. This is due to the same restrictions as listed above. Use a `const` instead. [breaking-change] [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/246
2014-10-06 10:17:01 -05:00
// Copyright 2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
struct A;
impl Drop for A {
fn drop(&mut self) {}
}
const FOO: A = A;
test: Convert statics to constants Additionally, add lots of tests for new functionality around statics and `static mut`.
2014-10-06 23:16:35 -05:00
//~^ ERROR: constants are not allowed to have destructors
rustc: Add `const` globals to the language This change is an implementation of [RFC 69][rfc] which adds a third kind of global to the language, `const`. This global is most similar to what the old `static` was, and if you're unsure about what to use then you should use a `const`. The semantics of these three kinds of globals are: * A `const` does not represent a memory location, but only a value. Constants are translated as rvalues, which means that their values are directly inlined at usage location (similar to a #define in C/C++). Constant values are, well, constant, and can not be modified. Any "modification" is actually a modification to a local value on the stack rather than the actual constant itself. Almost all values are allowed inside constants, whether they have interior mutability or not. There are a few minor restrictions listed in the RFC, but they should in general not come up too often. * A `static` now always represents a memory location (unconditionally). Any references to the same `static` are actually a reference to the same memory location. Only values whose types ascribe to `Sync` are allowed in a `static`. This restriction is in place because many threads may access a `static` concurrently. Lifting this restriction (and allowing unsafe access) is a future extension not implemented at this time. * A `static mut` continues to always represent a memory location. All references to a `static mut` continue to be `unsafe`. This is a large breaking change, and many programs will need to be updated accordingly. A summary of the breaking changes is: * Statics may no longer be used in patterns. Statics now always represent a memory location, which can sometimes be modified. To fix code, repurpose the matched-on-`static` to a `const`. static FOO: uint = 4; match n { FOO => { /* ... */ } _ => { /* ... */ } } change this code to: const FOO: uint = 4; match n { FOO => { /* ... */ } _ => { /* ... */ } } * Statics may no longer refer to other statics by value. Due to statics being able to change at runtime, allowing them to reference one another could possibly lead to confusing semantics. If you are in this situation, use a constant initializer instead. Note, however, that statics may reference other statics by address, however. * Statics may no longer be used in constant expressions, such as array lengths. This is due to the same restrictions as listed above. Use a `const` instead. [breaking-change] [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/246
2014-10-06 10:17:01 -05:00
fn main() {}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink