rust/src/test/run-pass/issue-2487-a.rs

struct socket {
    sock: int,

    drop { }

    fn set_identity()  {
        do closure {
            setsockopt_bytes(copy self.sock)
        }
    }
}

fn socket() -> socket {
    socket {
        sock: 1
    }
}

fn closure(f: fn()) { f() }

fn setsockopt_bytes(_sock: int) { }

fn main() {}
Remove the class keyword 2012-08-15 20:46:55 -05:00			`struct socket {`
Remove 'let' syntax for struct fields 2012-09-06 21:40:15 -05:00			`sock: int,`
Insert missing maybe_print_comment call for class destructors While it wasn't the original issue, the first program from #2487 failed the pretty-printing test because of this, so it's still a good test case :-) It also turns out that the second program from #2487 now triggers a kind error, so I figured I might as well add it as a test case. 2012-06-06 23:52:41 -05:00
			`drop { }`

			`fn set_identity() {`
Remove empty argument lists from do expressions 2012-07-04 14:04:28 -05:00			`do closure {`
Insert missing maybe_print_comment call for class destructors While it wasn't the original issue, the first program from #2487 failed the pretty-printing test because of this, so it's still a good test case :-) It also turns out that the second program from #2487 now triggers a kind error, so I figured I might as well add it as a test case. 2012-06-06 23:52:41 -05:00			`setsockopt_bytes(copy self.sock)`
			`}`
			`}`
			`}`

Remove struct ctors 2012-09-05 17:58:43 -05:00			`fn socket() -> socket {`
			`socket {`
			`sock: 1`
			`}`
			`}`

Insert missing maybe_print_comment call for class destructors While it wasn't the original issue, the first program from #2487 failed the pretty-printing test because of this, so it's still a good test case :-) It also turns out that the second program from #2487 now triggers a kind error, so I figured I might as well add it as a test case. 2012-06-06 23:52:41 -05:00			`fn closure(f: fn()) { f() }`

			`fn setsockopt_bytes(_sock: int) { }`

			`fn main() {}`