rust/tests/ui/macros/assert-long-condition.run.stderr

thread 'main' panicked at $DIR/assert-long-condition.rs:8:5:
assertion failed: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18
                                + 19 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 == 0
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
Add a ui test with an assertion that has a really long condition. The `\n` in the output is a little surprising. The next commit will deal with it. 2023-10-08 21:31:33 -05:00			`thread 'main' panicked at $DIR/assert-long-condition.rs:8:5:`
Don't `escape_debug` the condition of `assert!`. The assertion in `assert-long-condition.rs` used to be fail like this, all on one line: ``` thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18\n + 19 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 == 0', tests/ui/macros/assert-long-condition.rs:7:5 ``` The `\n` and subsequent indent is because the condition is pretty-printed, and the pretty-printer inserts a newline. Printing the newline in this way is arguably reasonable given that the message appears within single quotes, which is very similar to a string literal. However, after the assertion printing improvements that were released in 1.73, the assertion now fails like this: ``` thread 'main' panicked at tests/ui/macros/assert-long-condition.rs:7:5: assertion failed: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18\n + 19 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 == 0 ``` Now that there are no single quotes around the pretty-printed condition, the `\n` is quite strange. This commit gets rid of the `\n`, by removing the `escape_debug` done on the pretty-printed message. This results in the following: ``` thread 'main' panicked at tests/ui/macros/assert-long-condition.rs:7:5: assertion failed: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 + 19 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 == 0 ``` The overly-large indent is still strange, but that's a separate pretty-printing issue. This change helps with #108341. 2023-10-08 21:32:17 -05:00			`assertion failed: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18`
			`+ 19 + 20 + 21 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 == 0`
Add a ui test with an assertion that has a really long condition. The `\n` in the output is a little surprising. The next commit will deal with it. 2023-10-08 21:31:33 -05:00			note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace