rust/tests/ui/const-generics/min_const_generics/invalid-patterns.32bit.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

63 lines
2.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/invalid-patterns.rs:29:21
|
LL | get_flag::<false, 0xFF>();
| ^^^^ expected `char`, found `u8`
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/invalid-patterns.rs:31:14
|
LL | get_flag::<7, 'c'>();
| ^ expected `bool`, found integer
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/invalid-patterns.rs:33:14
|
LL | get_flag::<42, 0x5ad>();
| ^^ expected `bool`, found integer
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/invalid-patterns.rs:33:18
|
LL | get_flag::<42, 0x5ad>();
| ^^^^^ expected `char`, found `u8`
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/invalid-patterns.rs:38:32
2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
|
LL | get_flag::<false, { unsafe { char_raw.character } }>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ using uninitialized data, but this operation requires initialized memory
2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
error[E0080]: it is undefined behavior to use this value
--> $DIR/invalid-patterns.rs:41:14
2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
|
LL | get_flag::<{ unsafe { bool_raw.boolean } }, 'z'>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ constructing invalid value: encountered 0x42, but expected a boolean
2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
|
= note: The rules on what exactly is undefined behavior aren't clear, so this check might be overzealous. Please open an issue on the rustc repository if you believe it should not be considered undefined behavior.
= note: the raw bytes of the constant (size: 1, align: 1) {
42 │ B
}
error[E0080]: it is undefined behavior to use this value
--> $DIR/invalid-patterns.rs:43:14
2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
|
LL | get_flag::<{ unsafe { bool_raw.boolean } }, { unsafe { char_raw.character } }>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ constructing invalid value: encountered 0x42, but expected a boolean
2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
|
= note: The rules on what exactly is undefined behavior aren't clear, so this check might be overzealous. Please open an issue on the rustc repository if you believe it should not be considered undefined behavior.
= note: the raw bytes of the constant (size: 1, align: 1) {
42 │ B
}
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> $DIR/invalid-patterns.rs:43:58
2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
|
LL | get_flag::<{ unsafe { bool_raw.boolean } }, { unsafe { char_raw.character } }>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ using uninitialized data, but this operation requires initialized memory
2021-03-31 04:33:45 -05:00
error: aborting due to 8 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0080, E0308.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.