100 lines
3.6 KiB
Rust
100 lines
3.6 KiB
Rust
|
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
|
||
|
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
|
||
|
use rustc_hir::Item;
|
||
|
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintContext};
|
||
|
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
|
||
|
use rustc_span::Span;
|
||
|
|
||
|
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||
|
/// ### What it does
|
||
|
/// Checks for outer doc comments written with 4 forward slashes (`////`).
|
||
|
///
|
||
|
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||
|
/// This is (probably) a typo, and results in it not being a doc comment; just a regular
|
||
|
/// comment.
|
||
|
///
|
||
|
/// ### Example
|
||
|
/// ```rust
|
||
|
/// //// My amazing data structure
|
||
|
/// pub struct Foo {
|
||
|
/// // ...
|
||
|
/// }
|
||
|
/// ```
|
||
|
///
|
||
|
/// Use instead:
|
||
|
/// ```rust
|
||
|
/// /// My amazing data structure
|
||
|
/// pub struct Foo {
|
||
|
/// // ...
|
||
|
/// }
|
||
|
/// ```
|
||
|
#[clippy::version = "1.72.0"]
|
||
|
pub FOUR_FORWARD_SLASHES,
|
||
|
suspicious,
|
||
|
"comments with 4 forward slashes (`////`) likely intended to be doc comments (`///`)"
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
declare_lint_pass!(FourForwardSlashes => [FOUR_FORWARD_SLASHES]);
|
||
|
|
||
|
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for FourForwardSlashes {
|
||
|
fn check_item(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, item: &'tcx Item<'tcx>) {
|
||
|
if item.span.from_expansion() {
|
||
|
return;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
let sm = cx.sess().source_map();
|
||
|
let mut span = cx
|
||
|
.tcx
|
||
|
.hir()
|
||
|
.attrs(item.hir_id())
|
||
|
.iter()
|
||
|
.fold(item.span.shrink_to_lo(), |span, attr| span.to(attr.span));
|
||
|
let (Some(file), _, _, end_line, _) = sm.span_to_location_info(span) else {
|
||
|
return;
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
let mut bad_comments = vec![];
|
||
|
for line in (0..end_line.saturating_sub(1)).rev() {
|
||
|
let Some(contents) = file.get_line(line).map(|c| c.trim().to_owned()) else {
|
||
|
return;
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
// Keep searching until we find the next item
|
||
|
if !contents.is_empty() && !contents.starts_with("//") && !contents.starts_with("#[") {
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
if contents.starts_with("////") && !matches!(contents.chars().nth(4), Some('/' | '!')) {
|
||
|
let bounds = file.line_bounds(line);
|
||
|
let line_span = Span::with_root_ctxt(bounds.start, bounds.end);
|
||
|
span = line_span.to(span);
|
||
|
bad_comments.push((line_span, contents));
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
if !bad_comments.is_empty() {
|
||
|
span_lint_and_then(
|
||
|
cx,
|
||
|
FOUR_FORWARD_SLASHES,
|
||
|
span,
|
||
|
"this item has comments with 4 forward slashes (`////`). These look like doc comments, but they aren't",
|
||
|
|diag| {
|
||
|
let msg = if bad_comments.len() == 1 {
|
||
|
"make this a doc comment by removing one `/`"
|
||
|
} else {
|
||
|
"turn these into doc comments by removing one `/`"
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
diag.multipart_suggestion(
|
||
|
msg,
|
||
|
bad_comments
|
||
|
.into_iter()
|
||
|
// It's a little unfortunate but the span includes the `\n` yet the contents
|
||
|
// do not, so we must add it back. If some codebase uses `\r\n` instead they
|
||
|
// will need normalization but it should be fine
|
||
|
.map(|(span, c)| (span, c.replacen("////", "///", 1) + "\n"))
|
||
|
.collect(),
|
||
|
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
|
||
|
);
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|