2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
//! Provider for the `implied_outlives_bounds` query.
|
|
|
|
//! Do not call this query directory. See [`rustc::traits::query::implied_outlives_bounds`].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use rustc::infer::InferCtxt;
|
|
|
|
use rustc::infer::canonical::{self, Canonical};
|
|
|
|
use rustc::traits::{TraitEngine, TraitEngineExt};
|
|
|
|
use rustc::traits::query::outlives_bounds::OutlivesBound;
|
|
|
|
use rustc::traits::query::{CanonicalTyGoal, Fallible, NoSolution};
|
|
|
|
use rustc::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable};
|
|
|
|
use rustc::ty::outlives::Component;
|
|
|
|
use rustc::ty::query::Providers;
|
|
|
|
use rustc::ty::wf;
|
2018-11-01 03:13:11 -05:00
|
|
|
use smallvec::{SmallVec, smallvec};
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
use syntax::ast::DUMMY_NODE_ID;
|
2018-08-18 05:14:03 -05:00
|
|
|
use syntax::source_map::DUMMY_SP;
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
use rustc::traits::FulfillmentContext;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use rustc_data_structures::sync::Lrc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crate fn provide(p: &mut Providers) {
|
|
|
|
*p = Providers {
|
|
|
|
implied_outlives_bounds,
|
|
|
|
..*p
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>(
|
|
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'_, 'tcx, 'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
goal: CanonicalTyGoal<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
) -> Result<
|
2018-09-24 14:27:47 -05:00
|
|
|
Lrc<Canonical<'tcx, canonical::QueryResponse<'tcx, Vec<OutlivesBound<'tcx>>>>>,
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
NoSolution,
|
|
|
|
> {
|
|
|
|
tcx.infer_ctxt()
|
|
|
|
.enter_canonical_trait_query(&goal, |infcx, _fulfill_cx, key| {
|
|
|
|
let (param_env, ty) = key.into_parts();
|
|
|
|
compute_implied_outlives_bounds(&infcx, param_env, ty)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds<'tcx>(
|
|
|
|
infcx: &InferCtxt<'_, '_, 'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
ty: Ty<'tcx>
|
|
|
|
) -> Fallible<Vec<OutlivesBound<'tcx>>> {
|
|
|
|
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Sometimes when we ask what it takes for T: WF, we get back that
|
|
|
|
// U: WF is required; in that case, we push U onto this stack and
|
|
|
|
// process it next. Currently (at least) these resulting
|
|
|
|
// predicates are always guaranteed to be a subset of the original
|
|
|
|
// type, so we need not fear non-termination.
|
|
|
|
let mut wf_types = vec![ty];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut implied_bounds = vec![];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while let Some(ty) = wf_types.pop() {
|
|
|
|
// Compute the obligations for `ty` to be well-formed. If `ty` is
|
|
|
|
// an unresolved inference variable, just substituted an empty set
|
|
|
|
// -- because the return type here is going to be things we *add*
|
|
|
|
// to the environment, it's always ok for this set to be smaller
|
|
|
|
// than the ultimate set. (Note: normally there won't be
|
|
|
|
// unresolved inference variables here anyway, but there might be
|
|
|
|
// during typeck under some circumstances.)
|
|
|
|
let obligations =
|
|
|
|
wf::obligations(infcx, param_env, DUMMY_NODE_ID, ty, DUMMY_SP).unwrap_or(vec![]);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-26 20:59:49 -06:00
|
|
|
// N.B., all of these predicates *ought* to be easily proven
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
// true. In fact, their correctness is (mostly) implied by
|
|
|
|
// other parts of the program. However, in #42552, we had
|
|
|
|
// an annoying scenario where:
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// - Some `T::Foo` gets normalized, resulting in a
|
|
|
|
// variable `_1` and a `T: Trait<Foo=_1>` constraint
|
|
|
|
// (not sure why it couldn't immediately get
|
|
|
|
// solved). This result of `_1` got cached.
|
|
|
|
// - These obligations were dropped on the floor here,
|
|
|
|
// rather than being registered.
|
|
|
|
// - Then later we would get a request to normalize
|
|
|
|
// `T::Foo` which would result in `_1` being used from
|
|
|
|
// the cache, but hence without the `T: Trait<Foo=_1>`
|
|
|
|
// constraint. As a result, `_1` never gets resolved,
|
|
|
|
// and we get an ICE (in dropck).
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Therefore, we register any predicates involving
|
|
|
|
// inference variables. We restrict ourselves to those
|
|
|
|
// involving inference variables both for efficiency and
|
|
|
|
// to avoids duplicate errors that otherwise show up.
|
|
|
|
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(
|
|
|
|
infcx,
|
|
|
|
obligations
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.filter(|o| o.predicate.has_infer_types())
|
|
|
|
.cloned(),
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// From the full set of obligations, just filter down to the
|
|
|
|
// region relationships.
|
|
|
|
implied_bounds.extend(obligations.into_iter().flat_map(|obligation| {
|
2018-10-22 15:38:51 -05:00
|
|
|
assert!(!obligation.has_escaping_bound_vars());
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
match obligation.predicate {
|
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::Trait(..) |
|
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::Subtype(..) |
|
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::Projection(..) |
|
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::ClosureKind(..) |
|
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::ObjectSafe(..) |
|
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::ConstEvaluatable(..) => vec![],
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::WellFormed(subty) => {
|
|
|
|
wf_types.push(subty);
|
|
|
|
vec![]
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-24 15:30:34 -05:00
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::RegionOutlives(ref data) => match data.no_bound_vars() {
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
None => vec![],
|
|
|
|
Some(ty::OutlivesPredicate(r_a, r_b)) => {
|
|
|
|
vec![OutlivesBound::RegionSubRegion(r_b, r_a)]
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-24 15:30:34 -05:00
|
|
|
ty::Predicate::TypeOutlives(ref data) => match data.no_bound_vars() {
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
None => vec![],
|
|
|
|
Some(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty_a, r_b)) => {
|
|
|
|
let ty_a = infcx.resolve_type_vars_if_possible(&ty_a);
|
2018-11-01 03:13:11 -05:00
|
|
|
let mut components = smallvec![];
|
|
|
|
tcx.push_outlives_components(ty_a, &mut components);
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
implied_bounds_from_components(r_b, components)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Ensure that those obligations that we had to solve
|
|
|
|
// get solved *here*.
|
|
|
|
match fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(infcx) {
|
|
|
|
Ok(()) => Ok(implied_bounds),
|
|
|
|
Err(_) => Err(NoSolution),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// When we have an implied bound that `T: 'a`, we can further break
|
|
|
|
/// this down to determine what relationships would have to hold for
|
|
|
|
/// `T: 'a` to hold. We get to assume that the caller has validated
|
|
|
|
/// those relationships.
|
|
|
|
fn implied_bounds_from_components(
|
|
|
|
sub_region: ty::Region<'tcx>,
|
2018-11-01 03:13:11 -05:00
|
|
|
sup_components: SmallVec<[Component<'tcx>; 4]>,
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
) -> Vec<OutlivesBound<'tcx>> {
|
|
|
|
sup_components
|
|
|
|
.into_iter()
|
2018-10-29 10:28:33 -05:00
|
|
|
.filter_map(|component| {
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
match component {
|
|
|
|
Component::Region(r) =>
|
2018-10-29 10:28:33 -05:00
|
|
|
Some(OutlivesBound::RegionSubRegion(sub_region, r)),
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
Component::Param(p) =>
|
2018-10-29 10:28:33 -05:00
|
|
|
Some(OutlivesBound::RegionSubParam(sub_region, p)),
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
Component::Projection(p) =>
|
2018-10-29 10:28:33 -05:00
|
|
|
Some(OutlivesBound::RegionSubProjection(sub_region, p)),
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
Component::EscapingProjection(_) =>
|
|
|
|
// If the projection has escaping regions, don't
|
|
|
|
// try to infer any implied bounds even for its
|
|
|
|
// free components. This is conservative, because
|
|
|
|
// the caller will still have to prove that those
|
|
|
|
// free components outlive `sub_region`. But the
|
|
|
|
// idea is that the WAY that the caller proves
|
|
|
|
// that may change in the future and we want to
|
|
|
|
// give ourselves room to get smarter here.
|
2018-10-29 10:28:33 -05:00
|
|
|
None,
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
Component::UnresolvedInferenceVariable(..) =>
|
2018-10-29 10:28:33 -05:00
|
|
|
None,
|
2018-07-04 13:07:45 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
.collect()
|
|
|
|
}
|