rust/tests/mir-opt/copy-prop/borrowed_local.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

103 lines
2.7 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

// EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_PANIC_STRATEGY
//@ test-mir-pass: CopyProp
2024-04-07 13:33:18 -05:00
#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics, freeze)]
#![allow(unused_assignments)]
extern crate core;
2024-04-07 13:33:18 -05:00
use core::marker::Freeze;
use core::intrinsics::mir::*;
fn opaque(_: impl Sized) -> bool { true }
fn cmp_ref(a: &u8, b: &u8) -> bool {
std::ptr::eq(a as *const u8, b as *const u8)
}
#[custom_mir(dialect = "analysis", phase = "post-cleanup")]
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
fn compare_address() -> bool {
// CHECK-LABEL: fn compare_address(
// CHECK: bb0: {
// CHECK-NEXT: _1 = const 5_u8;
// CHECK-NEXT: _2 = &_1;
// CHECK-NEXT: _3 = _1;
// CHECK-NEXT: _4 = &_3;
// CHECK-NEXT: _0 = cmp_ref(_2, _4)
// CHECK: bb1: {
// CHECK-NEXT: _0 = opaque::<u8>(_3)
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
mir! {
{
let a = 5_u8;
let r1 = &a;
let b = a;
// We cannot propagate the place `a`.
let r2 = &b;
Call(RET = cmp_ref(r1, r2), ReturnTo(next), UnwindContinue())
}
next = {
// But we can propagate the value `a`.
Call(RET = opaque(b), ReturnTo(ret), UnwindContinue())
}
ret = {
Return()
}
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
}
}
2024-04-07 13:33:18 -05:00
/// Generic type `T` is `Freeze`, so shared borrows are immutable.
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
#[custom_mir(dialect = "analysis", phase = "post-cleanup")]
2024-04-07 13:33:18 -05:00
fn borrowed<T: Copy + Freeze>(x: T) -> bool {
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
// CHECK-LABEL: fn borrowed(
// CHECK: bb0: {
// CHECK-NEXT: _3 = &_1;
2024-04-07 13:33:18 -05:00
// CHECK-NEXT: _0 = opaque::<&T>(_3)
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
// CHECK: bb1: {
2024-04-07 13:33:18 -05:00
// CHECK-NEXT: _0 = opaque::<T>(_1)
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
mir! {
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
{
let a = x;
let r1 = &x;
Call(RET = opaque(r1), ReturnTo(next), UnwindContinue())
}
next = {
Call(RET = opaque(a), ReturnTo(ret), UnwindContinue())
}
ret = {
Return()
}
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
}
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
}
/// Generic type `T` is not known to be `Freeze`, so shared borrows may be mutable.
#[custom_mir(dialect = "analysis", phase = "post-cleanup")]
fn non_freeze<T: Copy>(x: T) -> bool {
// CHECK-LABEL: fn non_freeze(
// CHECK: bb0: {
// CHECK-NEXT: _2 = _1;
// CHECK-NEXT: _3 = &_1;
// CHECK-NEXT: _0 = opaque::<&T>(_3)
// CHECK: bb1: {
// CHECK-NEXT: _0 = opaque::<T>(_2)
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
mir! {
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
{
let a = x;
let r1 = &x;
Call(RET = opaque(r1), ReturnTo(next), UnwindContinue())
}
next = {
Call(RET = opaque(a), ReturnTo(ret), UnwindContinue())
}
ret = {
Return()
}
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
}
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
}
fn main() {
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
assert!(!compare_address());
non_freeze(5);
}
2024-04-07 11:23:16 -05:00
// EMIT_MIR borrowed_local.compare_address.CopyProp.diff
// EMIT_MIR borrowed_local.borrowed.CopyProp.diff
// EMIT_MIR borrowed_local.non_freeze.CopyProp.diff