rust/tests/mir-opt/building/custom/enums.rs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

127 lines
2.4 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

// skip-filecheck
#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics)]
extern crate core;
use core::intrinsics::mir::*;
// EMIT_MIR enums.switch_bool.built.after.mir
#[custom_mir(dialect = "built")]
pub fn switch_bool(b: bool) -> u32 {
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
mir! {
{
match b {
true => t,
false => f,
_ => f,
}
}
t = {
RET = 5;
Return()
}
f = {
RET = 10;
Return()
}
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
}
}
// EMIT_MIR enums.switch_option.built.after.mir
#[custom_mir(dialect = "built")]
pub fn switch_option(option: Option<()>) -> bool {
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
mir! {
{
let discr = Discriminant(option);
match discr {
0 => n,
1 => s,
_ => s,
}
}
n = {
RET = false;
Return()
}
s = {
RET = true;
Return()
}
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
}
}
#[repr(u8)]
enum Bool {
False = 0,
True = 1,
}
// EMIT_MIR enums.switch_option_repr.built.after.mir
#[custom_mir(dialect = "built")]
fn switch_option_repr(option: Bool) -> bool {
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
mir! {
{
let discr = Discriminant(option);
match discr {
0 => f,
_ => t,
}
}
t = {
RET = true;
Return()
}
f = {
RET = false;
Return()
}
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
}
}
// EMIT_MIR enums.set_discr.built.after.mir
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "initial")]
fn set_discr(option: &mut Option<()>) {
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
mir! {
{
Deinit(*option);
SetDiscriminant(*option, 0);
Return()
}
}
}
// EMIT_MIR enums.set_discr_repr.built.after.mir
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "initial")]
fn set_discr_repr(b: &mut Bool) {
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces. The `mir!` macro has multiple parts: - An optional return type annotation. - A sequence of zero or more local declarations. - A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited. - A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks. Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir! { let _unit: (); { let non_copy = S(42); let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy); // Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically // aliasing places! Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue()) } after_call = { Return() } } ``` Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so: ``` mir!( let x: [i32; 2]; let one: i32; { x = [42, 43]; one = 1; x = [one, 2]; RET = Move(x); Return() } ) ``` And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so: ``` mir!({ SetDiscriminant(*b, 0); Return() }) ``` This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the parens. This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block" style. Why? - Consistency is good. - The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros. - Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for `tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma. E.g.: ``` mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';' RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() }) ``` Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem, resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid syntax: ``` mir! { type RET = (i32, bool); { RET.0 = 1; RET.1 = true; Return() } } ```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
mir! {
{
SetDiscriminant(*b, 0);
Return()
}
}
}
fn main() {
assert_eq!(switch_bool(true), 5);
assert_eq!(switch_bool(false), 10);
assert_eq!(switch_option(Some(())), true);
assert_eq!(switch_option(None), false);
assert_eq!(switch_option_repr(Bool::True), true);
assert_eq!(switch_option_repr(Bool::False), false);
let mut opt = Some(());
set_discr(&mut opt);
assert_eq!(opt, None);
let mut b = Bool::True;
set_discr_repr(&mut b);
assert!(matches!(b, Bool::False));
}