rust/tests/ui/suggestions/struct-initializer-comma.rs

// run-rustfix

pub struct Foo {
    pub first: bool,
    pub second: u8,
}

fn main() {
    let _ = Foo {
        //~^ ERROR missing field
        first: true
        second: 25
        //~^ ERROR expected one of
    };
}
Audit uses of `span_suggestion_short` 2020-07-02 00:32:12 -05:00			`// run-rustfix`

			`pub struct Foo {`
			`pub first: bool,`
			`pub second: u8,`
Suggest a comma if a struct initializer field fails to parse Currently, we emit a "try adding a comma" suggestion if a comma is missing in a struct definition. However, we emit no such suggestion if a comma is missing in a struct initializer. This commit adds a "try adding a comma" suggestion when we don't find a comma during the parsing of a struct initializer field. The change to `src/test/ui/parser/removed-syntax-with-1.stderr` isn't great, but I don't see a good way of avoiding it. 2020-02-14 21:28:13 -06:00			`}`

			`fn main() {`
Audit uses of `span_suggestion_short` 2020-07-02 00:32:12 -05:00			`let _ = Foo {`
Suggest a comma if a struct initializer field fails to parse Currently, we emit a "try adding a comma" suggestion if a comma is missing in a struct definition. However, we emit no such suggestion if a comma is missing in a struct initializer. This commit adds a "try adding a comma" suggestion when we don't find a comma during the parsing of a struct initializer field. The change to `src/test/ui/parser/removed-syntax-with-1.stderr` isn't great, but I don't see a good way of avoiding it. 2020-02-14 21:28:13 -06:00			`//~^ ERROR missing field`
			`first: true`
			`second: 25`
			`//~^ ERROR expected one of`
			`};`
			`}`