rust/tests/ui/numeric/numeric-fields.stderr

error[E0560]: struct `S` has no field named `0b1`
  --> $DIR/numeric-fields.rs:4:15
   |
LL | struct S(u8, u16);
   |        - `S` defined here
...
LL |     let s = S{0b1: 10, 0: 11};
   |               ^^^ field does not exist
   |
help: `S` is a tuple struct, use the appropriate syntax
   |
LL |     let s = S(/* fields */);
   |             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

error[E0026]: struct `S` does not have a field named `0x1`
  --> $DIR/numeric-fields.rs:7:17
   |
LL |         S{0: a, 0x1: b, ..} => {}
   |                 ^^^
   |                 |
   |                 struct `S` does not have this field
   |                 help: `S` has a field named `1`

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

Some errors have detailed explanations: E0026, E0560.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0026`.
Move compile-fail tests with NOTE/HELP annotations to UI 2017-12-10 13:47:55 -06:00			error[E0560]: struct `S` has no field named `0b1`
Remove licenses 2018-12-25 09:56:47 -06:00			`--> $DIR/numeric-fields.rs:4:15`
Move compile-fail tests with NOTE/HELP annotations to UI 2017-12-10 13:47:55 -06:00			`\|`
provide variant definition on tuple struct unknow field error 2019-06-19 04:09:17 -05:00			`LL \| struct S(u8, u16);`
			\| - `S` defined here
			`...`
Fix rebase 2018-02-24 17:59:34 -06:00			`LL \| let s = S{0b1: 10, 0: 11};`
Ensure suggestion is in its own diagnostic window For two reasons: 1. Now that the suggestion span has been corrected, the output is a bit cluttered and hard to read. Putting the suggestion its own window creates more space. 2. It's easier to see what's being suggested, since now the version after the suggestion is applied is shown. 2021-09-01 22:20:46 -05:00			`\| ^^^ field does not exist`
			`\|`
			help: `S` is a tuple struct, use the appropriate syntax
			`\|`
			`LL \| let s = S(/* fields */);`
			`\| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Move compile-fail tests with NOTE/HELP annotations to UI 2017-12-10 13:47:55 -06:00
			error[E0026]: struct `S` does not have a field named `0x1`
Remove licenses 2018-12-25 09:56:47 -06:00			`--> $DIR/numeric-fields.rs:7:17`
Move compile-fail tests with NOTE/HELP annotations to UI 2017-12-10 13:47:55 -06:00			`\|`
Update UI tests 2018-02-22 18:42:32 -06:00			`LL \| S{0: a, 0x1: b, ..} => {}`
Suggest replacing an inexisting field for an unmentioned field This PR adds a suggestion to replace an inexisting field for an unmentioned field. Given the following code: ```rust enum Foo { Bar { alpha: u8, bravo: u8, charlie: u8 }, } fn foo(foo: Foo) { match foo { Foo::Bar { alpha, beta, // `bravo` miswritten as `beta` here. charlie, } => todo!(), } } ``` the compiler now emits the error messages below. ```text error[E0026]: variant `Foo::Bar` does not have a field named `beta` --> src/lib.rs:9:13 \| 9 \| beta, // `bravo` miswritten as `beta` here. \| ^^^^ \| \| \| variant `Foo::Bar` does not have this field \| help: `Foo::Bar` has a field named `bravo`: `bravo` ``` Note that this suggestion is available iff the number of inexisting fields and unmentioned fields are both 1. 2021-08-12 05:10:44 -05:00			`\| ^^^`
			`\| \|`
			\| struct `S` does not have this field
			\| help: `S` has a field named `1`
Move compile-fail tests with NOTE/HELP annotations to UI 2017-12-10 13:47:55 -06:00
			`error: aborting due to 2 previous errors`

hide `--explain` hint if error has no extended info 2019-04-17 12:26:38 -05:00			`Some errors have detailed explanations: E0026, E0560.`
update tests 2018-03-03 08:59:40 -06:00			For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0026`.