rust/tests/ui/nll/relate_tys/trait-hrtb.rs

// Test that NLL generates proper error spans for trait HRTB errors
//
// compile-flags:-Zno-leak-check

trait Foo<'a> {}

fn make_foo<'a>() -> Box<dyn Foo<'a>> {
    panic!()
}

fn main() {
    let x: Box<dyn Foo<'static>> = make_foo();
    let y: Box<dyn for<'a> Foo<'a>> = x; //~ ERROR mismatched types [E0308]
}
Improve HRTB error span when -Zno-leak-check is used As described in #57374, NLL currently produces unhelpful higher-ranked trait bound (HRTB) errors when '-Zno-leak-check' is enabled. This PR tackles one half of this issue - making the error message point at the proper span. The error message itself is still the very generic "higher-ranked subtype error", but this can be improved in a follow-up PR. The root cause of the bad spans lies in how NLL attempts to compute the 'blamed' region, for which it will retrieve a span for. Consider the following code, which (correctly) does not compile: ```rust let my_val: u8 = 25; let a: &u8 = &my_val; let b = a; let c = b; let d: &'static u8 = c; ``` This will cause NLL to generate the following subtype constraints: d :< c c :< b b <: a Since normal Rust lifetimes are covariant, this results in the following region constraints (I'm using 'd to denote the lifetime of 'd', 'c to denote the lifetime of 'c, etc.): 'c: 'd 'b: 'c 'a: 'b From this, we can derive that 'a: 'd holds, which implies that 'a: 'static must hold. However, this is not the case, since 'a refers to 'my_val', which does not outlive the current function. When NLL attempts to infer regions for this code, it will see that the region 'a has grown 'too large' - it will be inferred to outlive 'static, despite the fact that is not declared as outliving 'static We can find the region responsible, 'd, by starting at the end of the 'constraint chain' we generated above. This works because for normal (non-higher-ranked) lifetimes, we generally build up a 'chain' of lifetime constraints away from the original variable/lifetime. That is, our original lifetime 'a is required to outlive progressively more regions. If it ends up living for too long, we can look at the 'end' of this chain to determine the 'most recent' usage that caused the lifetime to grow too large. However, this logic does not work correctly when higher-ranked trait bounds (HRTBs) come into play. This is because HRTBs have contravariance with respect to their bound regions. For example, this code snippet compiles: ```rust let a: for<'a> fn(&'a ()) = \|_\| {}; let b: fn(&'static ()) = a; ``` Here, we require that 'a' is a subtype of 'b'. Because of contravariance, we end up with the region constraint 'static: 'a, not 'a: 'static This means that our 'constraint chains' grow in the opposite direction of 'normal lifetime' constraint chains. As we introduce subtypes, our lifetime ends up being outlived by other lifetimes, rather than outliving other lifetimes. Therefore, starting at the end of the 'constraint chain' will cause us to 'blame' a lifetime close to the original definition of a variable, instead of close to where the bad lifetime constraint is introduced. This PR improves how we select the region to blame for 'too large' universal lifetimes, when bound lifetimes are involved. If the region we're checking is a 'placeholder' region (e.g. the region 'a' in for<'a>, or the implicit region in fn(&())), we start traversing the constraint chain from the beginning, rather than the end. There are two (maybe more) different ways we generate region constraints for NLL: requirements generated from trait queries, and requirements generated from MIR subtype constraints. While the former always use explicit placeholder regions, the latter is more tricky. In order to implement contravariance for HRTBs, TypeRelating replaces placeholder regions with existential regions. This requires us to keep track of whether or not an existential region was originally a placeholder region. When we look for a region to blame, we check if our starting region is either a placeholder region or is an existential region created from a placeholder region. If so, we start iterating from the beginning of the constraint chain, rather than the end. 2019-08-18 00:20:24 -05:00			`// Test that NLL generates proper error spans for trait HRTB errors`
			`//`
			`// compile-flags:-Zno-leak-check`

			`trait Foo<'a> {}`

			`fn make_foo<'a>() -> Box<dyn Foo<'a>> {`
			`panic!()`
			`}`

			`fn main() {`
			`let x: Box<dyn Foo<'static>> = make_foo();`
Report nicer errors for HRTB NLL errors from queries 2021-06-07 14:25:19 -05:00			`let y: Box<dyn for<'a> Foo<'a>> = x; //~ ERROR mismatched types [E0308]`
Improve HRTB error span when -Zno-leak-check is used As described in #57374, NLL currently produces unhelpful higher-ranked trait bound (HRTB) errors when '-Zno-leak-check' is enabled. This PR tackles one half of this issue - making the error message point at the proper span. The error message itself is still the very generic "higher-ranked subtype error", but this can be improved in a follow-up PR. The root cause of the bad spans lies in how NLL attempts to compute the 'blamed' region, for which it will retrieve a span for. Consider the following code, which (correctly) does not compile: ```rust let my_val: u8 = 25; let a: &u8 = &my_val; let b = a; let c = b; let d: &'static u8 = c; ``` This will cause NLL to generate the following subtype constraints: d :< c c :< b b <: a Since normal Rust lifetimes are covariant, this results in the following region constraints (I'm using 'd to denote the lifetime of 'd', 'c to denote the lifetime of 'c, etc.): 'c: 'd 'b: 'c 'a: 'b From this, we can derive that 'a: 'd holds, which implies that 'a: 'static must hold. However, this is not the case, since 'a refers to 'my_val', which does not outlive the current function. When NLL attempts to infer regions for this code, it will see that the region 'a has grown 'too large' - it will be inferred to outlive 'static, despite the fact that is not declared as outliving 'static We can find the region responsible, 'd, by starting at the end of the 'constraint chain' we generated above. This works because for normal (non-higher-ranked) lifetimes, we generally build up a 'chain' of lifetime constraints away from the original variable/lifetime. That is, our original lifetime 'a is required to outlive progressively more regions. If it ends up living for too long, we can look at the 'end' of this chain to determine the 'most recent' usage that caused the lifetime to grow too large. However, this logic does not work correctly when higher-ranked trait bounds (HRTBs) come into play. This is because HRTBs have contravariance with respect to their bound regions. For example, this code snippet compiles: ```rust let a: for<'a> fn(&'a ()) = \|_\| {}; let b: fn(&'static ()) = a; ``` Here, we require that 'a' is a subtype of 'b'. Because of contravariance, we end up with the region constraint 'static: 'a, not 'a: 'static This means that our 'constraint chains' grow in the opposite direction of 'normal lifetime' constraint chains. As we introduce subtypes, our lifetime ends up being outlived by other lifetimes, rather than outliving other lifetimes. Therefore, starting at the end of the 'constraint chain' will cause us to 'blame' a lifetime close to the original definition of a variable, instead of close to where the bad lifetime constraint is introduced. This PR improves how we select the region to blame for 'too large' universal lifetimes, when bound lifetimes are involved. If the region we're checking is a 'placeholder' region (e.g. the region 'a' in for<'a>, or the implicit region in fn(&())), we start traversing the constraint chain from the beginning, rather than the end. There are two (maybe more) different ways we generate region constraints for NLL: requirements generated from trait queries, and requirements generated from MIR subtype constraints. While the former always use explicit placeholder regions, the latter is more tricky. In order to implement contravariance for HRTBs, TypeRelating replaces placeholder regions with existential regions. This requires us to keep track of whether or not an existential region was originally a placeholder region. When we look for a region to blame, we check if our starting region is either a placeholder region or is an existential region created from a placeholder region. If so, we start iterating from the beginning of the constraint chain, rather than the end. 2019-08-18 00:20:24 -05:00			`}`