rust/src/test/run-make/issue-36710/Makefile

include ../../run-make-fulldeps/tools.mk

all: foo
	$(call RUN,foo)

foo: foo.rs $(call NATIVE_STATICLIB,foo)
	$(RUSTC) $< -lfoo $(EXTRARSCXXFLAGS) --target $(TARGET)

$(TMPDIR)/libfoo.o: foo.cpp
	$(call COMPILE_OBJ_CXX,$@,$<)
Move issue-36710 test to run-make Somewhat hacky to reuse `tools.mk` like this, we should probably migrate most of them now 2020-10-14 14:29:57 +02:00			`include ../../run-make-fulldeps/tools.mk`
Add a test for issue 36710. This still expectedly fails for musl targets with +crt-static. 2018-05-02 10:26:00 +02:00
use ignore directives for run-make tests This makes the tests easier to read, and makes it possible to tell which tests aren't being run on the host platform. Fixes #56704. 2019-01-06 16:27:57 -05:00			`all: foo`
Add a test for issue 36710. This still expectedly fails for musl targets with +crt-static. 2018-05-02 10:26:00 +02:00			`$(call RUN,foo)`

			`foo: foo.rs $(call NATIVE_STATICLIB,foo)`
run-make: Specify --target to rustc Resolves #78911 The target's linker was used but rustc wasn't told to build for that target (instead defaulting to the host). This led to the host instead of the target getting tested and to the linker getting inappropriate arguments. 2021-01-09 22:54:21 +00:00			`$(RUSTC) $< -lfoo $(EXTRARSCXXFLAGS) --target $(TARGET)`
Add a test for issue 36710. This still expectedly fails for musl targets with +crt-static. 2018-05-02 10:26:00 +02:00
			`$(TMPDIR)/libfoo.o: foo.cpp`
			`$(call COMPILE_OBJ_CXX,$@,$<)`