mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
rust/tests/rustdoc-ui/lints/unknown-renamed-lints.stderr

63 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Warn about unknown or renamed lints Originally I tried to do a much broader refactoring that got rid of `init_lints` altogether. My reasoning is that now the lints aren't being run anymore (after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73566), there's no need to ignore them explicitly. But it seems there are still some lints that aren't affected by setting `lint_mod` to a no-op: ``` deny(pub_use_of_private_extern_crate) deny(const_err) warn(unused_imports) ``` (there are possibly more, these are just the ones that failed in the rustdoc test suite). Some of these seem like we really should be warning about, but that's a much larger change and I don't propose to make it here. So for the time being, this just adds the `unknown_lints` and `renamed_or_removed_lints` passes to the list of lints rustdoc warns about.
2020-08-25 10:02:16 -04:00
error: unknown lint: `x`
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:5:9
|
LL | #![deny(x)]
| ^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:1:9
|
LL | #![deny(unknown_lints)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2020-12-29 23:16:16 -05:00
error: unknown lint: `rustdoc::x`
Warn about unknown or renamed lints Originally I tried to do a much broader refactoring that got rid of `init_lints` altogether. My reasoning is that now the lints aren't being run anymore (after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73566), there's no need to ignore them explicitly. But it seems there are still some lints that aren't affected by setting `lint_mod` to a no-op: ``` deny(pub_use_of_private_extern_crate) deny(const_err) warn(unused_imports) ``` (there are possibly more, these are just the ones that failed in the rustdoc test suite). Some of these seem like we really should be warning about, but that's a much larger change and I don't propose to make it here. So for the time being, this just adds the `unknown_lints` and `renamed_or_removed_lints` passes to the list of lints rustdoc warns about.
2020-08-25 10:02:16 -04:00
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:7:9
|
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2020-12-29 23:16:16 -05:00
LL | #![deny(rustdoc::x)]
Suggest lint groups
2021-05-05 10:33:14 -05:00
| ^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `rustdoc::all`
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2020-12-29 23:16:16 -05:00
error: lint `intra_doc_link_resolution_failure` has been renamed to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links`
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:9:9
|
Warn about unknown or renamed lints Originally I tried to do a much broader refactoring that got rid of `init_lints` altogether. My reasoning is that now the lints aren't being run anymore (after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73566), there's no need to ignore them explicitly. But it seems there are still some lints that aren't affected by setting `lint_mod` to a no-op: ``` deny(pub_use_of_private_extern_crate) deny(const_err) warn(unused_imports) ``` (there are possibly more, these are just the ones that failed in the rustdoc test suite). Some of these seem like we really should be warning about, but that's a much larger change and I don't propose to make it here. So for the time being, this just adds the `unknown_lints` and `renamed_or_removed_lints` passes to the list of lints rustdoc warns about.
2020-08-25 10:02:16 -04:00
LL | #![deny(intra_doc_link_resolution_failure)]
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2020-12-29 23:16:16 -05:00
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use the new name: `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links`
Warn about unknown or renamed lints Originally I tried to do a much broader refactoring that got rid of `init_lints` altogether. My reasoning is that now the lints aren't being run anymore (after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73566), there's no need to ignore them explicitly. But it seems there are still some lints that aren't affected by setting `lint_mod` to a no-op: ``` deny(pub_use_of_private_extern_crate) deny(const_err) warn(unused_imports) ``` (there are possibly more, these are just the ones that failed in the rustdoc test suite). Some of these seem like we really should be warning about, but that's a much larger change and I don't propose to make it here. So for the time being, this just adds the `unknown_lints` and `renamed_or_removed_lints` passes to the list of lints rustdoc warns about.
2020-08-25 10:02:16 -04:00
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:3:9
|
LL | #![deny(renamed_and_removed_lints)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Rename non_autolinks -> bare_urls
2021-03-27 23:35:02 -04:00
error: lint `non_autolinks` has been renamed to `rustdoc::bare_urls`
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:11:9
|
LL | #![deny(non_autolinks)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use the new name: `rustdoc::bare_urls`
error: lint `rustdoc::non_autolinks` has been renamed to `rustdoc::bare_urls`
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:13:9
|
LL | #![deny(rustdoc::non_autolinks)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use the new name: `rustdoc::bare_urls`
Warn when `rustdoc::` group is omitted from lint names
2021-07-03 15:20:29 -04:00
error: lint `private_doc_tests` has been renamed to `rustdoc::private_doc_tests`
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:16:9
|
LL | #![deny(private_doc_tests)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use the new name: `rustdoc::private_doc_tests`
Rename `rustdoc` to `rustdoc::all` When rustdoc lints were changed to be tool lints, the `rustdoc` group was removed, leading to spurious warnings like ``` warning: unknown lint: `rustdoc` ``` The lint group still worked when rustdoc ran, since rustdoc added the group itself. This renames the group to `rustdoc::all` for consistency with `clippy::all` and the rest of the rustdoc lints.
2021-03-05 09:50:20 -05:00
error: lint `rustdoc` has been removed: use `rustdoc::all` instead
Warn when `rustdoc::` group is omitted from lint names
2021-07-03 15:20:29 -04:00
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:19:9
Rename `rustdoc` to `rustdoc::all` When rustdoc lints were changed to be tool lints, the `rustdoc` group was removed, leading to spurious warnings like ``` warning: unknown lint: `rustdoc` ``` The lint group still worked when rustdoc ran, since rustdoc added the group itself. This renames the group to `rustdoc::all` for consistency with `clippy::all` and the rest of the rustdoc lints.
2021-03-05 09:50:20 -05:00
|
LL | #![deny(rustdoc)]
| ^^^^^^^
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2020-12-29 23:16:16 -05:00
error: unknown lint: `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`
Warn when `rustdoc::` group is omitted from lint names
2021-07-03 15:20:29 -04:00
--> $DIR/unknown-renamed-lints.rs:23:9
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2020-12-29 23:16:16 -05:00
|
LL | #![deny(rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Make `configure_and_expand` "infalllible" by just aborting the compilation if it fails instead of bubbling out an error
2023-02-16 14:03:31 +00:00
error: aborting due to 8 previous errors
Warn about unknown or renamed lints Originally I tried to do a much broader refactoring that got rid of `init_lints` altogether. My reasoning is that now the lints aren't being run anymore (after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73566), there's no need to ignore them explicitly. But it seems there are still some lints that aren't affected by setting `lint_mod` to a no-op: ``` deny(pub_use_of_private_extern_crate) deny(const_err) warn(unused_imports) ``` (there are possibly more, these are just the ones that failed in the rustdoc test suite). Some of these seem like we really should be warning about, but that's a much larger change and I don't propose to make it here. So for the time being, this just adds the `unknown_lints` and `renamed_or_removed_lints` passes to the list of lints rustdoc warns about.
2020-08-25 10:02:16 -04:00
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink