2024-04-20 06:19:34 -05:00
|
|
|
//@ test-mir-pass: SimplifyCfg-after-unreachable-enum-branching
|
2024-03-09 00:43:38 -06:00
|
|
|
#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics)]
|
|
|
|
|
#![crate_type = "lib"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use std::intrinsics::mir::*;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that we correctly cleaned up the dead BB.
|
|
|
|
|
// EMIT_MIR simplify_dead_blocks.assert_nonzero_nonmax.SimplifyCfg-after-unreachable-enum-branching.diff
|
|
|
|
|
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "post-cleanup")]
|
|
|
|
|
pub unsafe fn assert_nonzero_nonmax(x: u8) -> u8 {
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: fn assert_nonzero_nonmax(
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: bb0: {
|
2024-08-18 17:51:53 -05:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: switchInt(copy {{_[0-9]+}}) -> [0: [[unreachable:bb.*]], 1: [[retblock2:bb.*]], 255: [[unreachable:bb.*]], otherwise: [[retblock:bb.*]]];
|
2024-03-09 00:43:38 -06:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: }
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: _0 = const 1_u8;
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [[retblock2]]: {
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: _0 = const 2_u8;
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: return;
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: }
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [[unreachable]]: {
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: unreachable;
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: }
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [[retblock]]: {
|
2024-08-18 17:51:53 -05:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: _0 = copy _1;
|
2024-03-09 00:43:38 -06:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: return;
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: }
|
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces.
The `mir!` macro has multiple parts:
- An optional return type annotation.
- A sequence of zero or more local declarations.
- A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited.
- A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks.
Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so:
```
mir! {
let _unit: ();
{
let non_copy = S(42);
let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy);
// Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically
// aliasing places!
Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
}
after_call = {
Return()
}
}
```
Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so:
```
mir!(
let x: [i32; 2];
let one: i32;
{
x = [42, 43];
one = 1;
x = [one, 2];
RET = Move(x);
Return()
}
)
```
And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so:
```
mir!({
SetDiscriminant(*b, 0);
Return()
})
```
This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory
starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the
parens.
This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block"
style. Why?
- Consistency is good.
- The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use
parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros.
- Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for
`tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros
that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's
changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that
use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma.
E.g.:
```
mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';'
RET.0 = 1;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
})
```
Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem,
resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid
syntax:
```
mir! {
type RET = (i32, bool);
{
RET.0 = 1;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
}
}
```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
|
|
|
mir! {
|
2024-03-09 00:43:38 -06:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
match x {
|
|
|
|
|
0 => unreachable,
|
|
|
|
|
1 => retblock2,
|
|
|
|
|
u8::MAX => unreachable,
|
|
|
|
|
_ => retblock,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
deadRetblock1 = {
|
|
|
|
|
RET = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
Return()
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
retblock2 = {
|
|
|
|
|
RET = 2;
|
|
|
|
|
Return()
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
unreachable = {
|
|
|
|
|
Unreachable()
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
retblock = {
|
|
|
|
|
RET = x;
|
|
|
|
|
Return()
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
Reformat `mir!` macro invocations to use braces.
The `mir!` macro has multiple parts:
- An optional return type annotation.
- A sequence of zero or more local declarations.
- A mandatory starting anonymous basic block, which is brace-delimited.
- A sequence of zero of more additional named basic blocks.
Some `mir!` invocations use braces with a "block" style, like so:
```
mir! {
let _unit: ();
{
let non_copy = S(42);
let ptr = std::ptr::addr_of_mut!(non_copy);
// Inside `callee`, the first argument and `*ptr` are basically
// aliasing places!
Call(_unit = callee(Move(*ptr), ptr), ReturnTo(after_call), UnwindContinue())
}
after_call = {
Return()
}
}
```
Some invocations use parens with a "block" style, like so:
```
mir!(
let x: [i32; 2];
let one: i32;
{
x = [42, 43];
one = 1;
x = [one, 2];
RET = Move(x);
Return()
}
)
```
And some invocations uses parens with a "tighter" style, like so:
```
mir!({
SetDiscriminant(*b, 0);
Return()
})
```
This last style is generally used for cases where just the mandatory
starting basic block is present. Its braces are placed next to the
parens.
This commit changes all `mir!` invocations to use braces with a "block"
style. Why?
- Consistency is good.
- The contents of the invocation is a block of code, so it's odd to use
parens. They are more normally used for function-like macros.
- Most importantly, the next commit will enable rustfmt for
`tests/mir-opt/`. rustfmt is more aggressive about formatting macros
that use parens than macros that use braces. Without this commit's
changes, rustfmt would break a couple of `mir!` macro invocations that
use braces within `tests/mir-opt` by inserting an extraneous comma.
E.g.:
```
mir!(type RET = (i32, bool);, { // extraneous comma after ';'
RET.0 = 1;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
})
```
Switching those `mir!` invocations to use braces avoids that problem,
resulting in this, which is nicer to read as well as being valid
syntax:
```
mir! {
type RET = (i32, bool);
{
RET.0 = 1;
RET.1 = true;
Return()
}
}
```
2024-06-02 19:19:57 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2024-03-09 00:43:38 -06:00
|
|
|
}
|
