rust/src/test/run-fail/unique-fail.rs

// Copyright 2012 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.

// error-pattern: panic
fn main() { box panic!(); }
Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup. 2012-12-10 19:32:48 -06:00			`// Copyright 2012 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT`
			`// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at`
			`// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.`
			`//`
			`// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or`
			`// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license`
			`// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your`
			`// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed`
			`// except according to those terms.`

Update infrastructure for fail -> panic This includes updating the language items and marking what needs to change after a snapshot. If you do not use the standard library, the language items you need to implement have changed. For example: ```rust #[lang = "fail_fmt"] fn fail_fmt() -> ! { loop {} } ``` is now ```rust #[lang = "panic_fmt"] fn panic_fmt() -> ! { loop {} } ``` Related, lesser-implemented language items `fail` and `fail_bounds_check` have become `panic` and `panic_bounds_check`, as well. These are implemented by `libcore`, so it is unlikely (though possible!) that these two renamings will affect you. [breaking-change] Fix test suite 2014-10-28 13:07:33 -05:00			`// error-pattern: panic`
Rename fail! to panic! https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . \| xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change] 2014-10-09 14:17:22 -05:00			`fn main() { box panic!(); }`