mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
78bb5ee79e
rust/tests/coverage/inline-dead.cov-map

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

48 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Function name: inline_dead::dead (unused)
coverage: Format all remaining tests These tests can simply be reformatted as normal, because the resulting changes are unimportant.
2024-01-15 20:52:08 -06:00
Raw bytes (9): 0x[01, 01, 00, 01, 00, 17, 01, 02, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 1
coverage: Format all remaining tests These tests can simply be reformatted as normal, because the resulting changes are unimportant.
2024-01-15 20:52:08 -06:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 23, 1) to (start + 2, 2)
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-07 21:13:05 -05:00
Highest counter ID seen: (none)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Function name: inline_dead::live::<false>
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
Raw bytes (26): 0x[01, 01, 01, 01, 00, 04, 01, 0e, 01, 01, 09, 00, 02, 09, 00, 0f, 02, 02, 09, 00, 0a, 01, 02, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
Number of expressions: 1
coverage: Consistently remove unused counter IDs from expressions/mappings
2023-10-24 06:48:59 -05:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Zero
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
coverage: Format all remaining tests These tests can simply be reformatted as normal, because the resulting changes are unimportant.
2024-01-15 20:52:08 -06:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 14, 1) to (start + 1, 9)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 10)
coverage: Consistently remove unused counter IDs from expressions/mappings
2023-10-24 06:48:59 -05:00
= (c0 - Zero)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-07 21:13:05 -05:00
Highest counter ID seen: c0
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Function name: inline_dead::main
coverage: Discard spans that fill the entire function body When we try to extract coverage-relevant spans from MIR, sometimes we see MIR statements/terminators whose spans cover the entire function body. Those spans tend to be unhelpful for coverage purposes, because they often represent compiler-inserted code, e.g. the implicit return value of `()`.
2024-02-15 01:12:27 -06:00
Raw bytes (14): 0x[01, 01, 00, 02, 01, 04, 01, 03, 0a, 01, 06, 05, 01, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Store each BCB's code regions in one coverage statement If a BCB has more than one code region, those extra regions can now all be stored in the same coverage statement, instead of being stored in additional statements.
2023-09-18 23:15:33 -05:00
Number of expressions: 0
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 2
coverage: Discard spans that fill the entire function body When we try to extract coverage-relevant spans from MIR, sometimes we see MIR statements/terminators whose spans cover the entire function body. Those spans tend to be unhelpful for coverage purposes, because they often represent compiler-inserted code, e.g. the implicit return value of `()`.
2024-02-15 01:12:27 -06:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 4, 1) to (start + 3, 10)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 6, 5) to (start + 1, 2)
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-07 21:13:05 -05:00
Highest counter ID seen: c0
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Function name: inline_dead::main::{closure#0}
coverage: Format all remaining tests These tests can simply be reformatted as normal, because the resulting changes are unimportant.
2024-01-15 20:52:08 -06:00
Raw bytes (23): 0x[01, 01, 02, 00, 06, 01, 00, 03, 01, 07, 17, 01, 16, 00, 01, 17, 00, 18, 03, 01, 05, 00, 06]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Handle fn signature spans more consistently near `?`
2023-10-17 02:58:35 -05:00
Number of expressions: 2
coverage: Consistently remove unused counter IDs from expressions/mappings
2023-10-24 06:48:59 -05:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Zero, rhs = Expression(1, Sub)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Zero
coverage: Handle fn signature spans more consistently near `?`
2023-10-17 02:58:35 -05:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 3
coverage: Overhaul how "visible macros" are determined
2023-12-27 22:08:24 -06:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 7, 23) to (start + 1, 22)
coverage: Format all remaining tests These tests can simply be reformatted as normal, because the resulting changes are unimportant.
2024-01-15 20:52:08 -06:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 23) to (start + 0, 24)
- Code(Expression(0, Add)) at (prev + 1, 5) to (start + 0, 6)
coverage: Consistently remove unused counter IDs from expressions/mappings
2023-10-24 06:48:59 -05:00
= (Zero + (c0 - Zero))
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed. (The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
2024-10-07 21:13:05 -05:00
Highest counter ID seen: c0
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink