rust/src/test/ui/issues/issue-20714.stderr

error[E0618]: expected function, found `G`
  --> $DIR/issue-20714.rs:4:13
   |
LL | struct G;
   | -------- `G` defined here
...
LL |     let g = G();
   |             ^--
   |             |
   |             call expression requires function

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0618`.
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 16:11:54 -05:00			error[E0618]: expected function, found `G`
Remove licenses 2018-12-25 09:56:47 -06:00			`--> $DIR/issue-20714.rs:4:13`
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 16:11:54 -05:00			`\|`
			`LL \| struct G;`
Shorten def_span for more items. 2022-02-13 09:27:59 -06:00			\| -------- `G` defined here
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 16:11:54 -05:00			`...`
Update tests 2019-03-09 06:03:44 -06:00			`LL \| let g = G();`
in which the E0618 "expected function" diagnostic gets a makeover Now the main span focuses on the erroneous not-a-function callee, while showing the entire call expression is relegated to a secondary span. In the case where the erroneous callee is itself a call, we point out the definition, and, if the call expression spans multiple lines, tentatively suggest a semicolon (because we suspect that the "outer" call is actually supposed to be a tuple). The new `bug!` assertion is, in fact, safe (`confirm_builtin_call` is only called by `check_call`, which is only called with a first arg of kind `ExprKind::Call` in `check_expr_kind`). Resolves #51055. 2018-11-10 22:46:05 -06:00			`\| ^--`
			`\| \|`
			`\| call expression requires function`
Move some `compile-fail` tests to `ui` 2018-07-15 16:11:54 -05:00
			`error: aborting due to previous error`

			For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0618`.