rust/clippy_lints/src/overflow_check_conditional.rs

75 lines
3.3 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint;
2021-03-16 11:06:34 -05:00
use clippy_utils::SpanlessEq;
2018-11-27 14:14:15 -06:00
use if_chain::if_chain;
2020-02-21 02:39:38 -06:00
use rustc_hir::{BinOpKind, Expr, ExprKind, QPath};
2020-01-12 00:08:41 -06:00
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
2020-01-11 05:37:08 -06:00
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
2016-03-06 09:01:17 -06:00
2018-03-28 08:24:26 -05:00
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Detects classic underflow/overflow checks.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Most classic C underflow/overflow checks will fail in
/// Rust. Users can use functions like `overflowing_*` and `wrapping_*` instead.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// # let a = 1;
/// # let b = 2;
/// a + b < a;
/// ```
pub OVERFLOW_CHECK_CONDITIONAL,
2018-03-28 08:24:26 -05:00
complexity,
"overflow checks inspired by C which are likely to panic"
}
2016-03-06 09:01:17 -06:00
2019-04-08 15:43:55 -05:00
declare_lint_pass!(OverflowCheckConditional => [OVERFLOW_CHECK_CONDITIONAL]);
2016-03-06 09:01:17 -06:00
2021-10-04 01:33:40 -05:00
const OVERFLOW_MSG: &str = "you are trying to use classic C overflow conditions that will fail in Rust";
const UNDERFLOW_MSG: &str = "you are trying to use classic C underflow conditions that will fail in Rust";
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for OverflowCheckConditional {
2016-03-07 23:33:30 -06:00
// a + b < a, a > a + b, a < a - b, a - b > a
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>) {
let eq = |l, r| SpanlessEq::new(cx).eq_path_segment(l, r);
if_chain! {
if let ExprKind::Binary(ref op, first, second) = expr.kind;
if let ExprKind::Binary(ref op2, ident1, ident2) = first.kind;
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, path1)) = ident1.kind;
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, path2)) = ident2.kind;
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, path3)) = second.kind;
if eq(&path1.segments[0], &path3.segments[0]) || eq(&path2.segments[0], &path3.segments[0]);
2020-07-17 03:47:04 -05:00
if cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(ident1).is_integral();
if cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(ident2).is_integral();
then {
2021-10-04 01:33:40 -05:00
if op.node == BinOpKind::Lt && op2.node == BinOpKind::Add {
span_lint(cx, OVERFLOW_CHECK_CONDITIONAL, expr.span, OVERFLOW_MSG);
2016-03-07 23:33:30 -06:00
}
2021-10-04 01:33:40 -05:00
if op.node == BinOpKind::Gt && op2.node == BinOpKind::Sub {
span_lint(cx, OVERFLOW_CHECK_CONDITIONAL, expr.span, UNDERFLOW_MSG);
2016-03-07 23:33:30 -06:00
}
}
}
2016-03-07 15:27:45 -06:00
if_chain! {
if let ExprKind::Binary(ref op, first, second) = expr.kind;
if let ExprKind::Binary(ref op2, ident1, ident2) = second.kind;
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, path1)) = ident1.kind;
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, path2)) = ident2.kind;
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(_, path3)) = first.kind;
if eq(&path1.segments[0], &path3.segments[0]) || eq(&path2.segments[0], &path3.segments[0]);
2020-07-17 03:47:04 -05:00
if cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(ident1).is_integral();
if cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(ident2).is_integral();
then {
2021-10-04 01:33:40 -05:00
if op.node == BinOpKind::Gt && op2.node == BinOpKind::Add {
span_lint(cx, OVERFLOW_CHECK_CONDITIONAL, expr.span, OVERFLOW_MSG);
2016-03-07 23:33:30 -06:00
}
2021-10-04 01:33:40 -05:00
if op.node == BinOpKind::Lt && op2.node == BinOpKind::Sub {
span_lint(cx, OVERFLOW_CHECK_CONDITIONAL, expr.span, UNDERFLOW_MSG);
2016-03-07 23:33:30 -06:00
}
}
}
2016-03-06 09:01:17 -06:00
}
}