mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
5fc39e0796
rust/tests/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/repr_packed.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

160 lines
4.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
error[E0658]: attributes on expressions are experimental
closure field capturing: don't depend on alignment of packed fields
2023-08-28 08:42:23 -05:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:14:17
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let mut c = #[rustc_capture_analysis]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #15701 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]` to the crate attributes to enable
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
error[E0658]: attributes on expressions are experimental
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:45:17
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let mut c = #[rustc_capture_analysis]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #15701 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]` to the crate attributes to enable
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
error[E0658]: attributes on expressions are experimental
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:81:13
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let c = #[rustc_capture_analysis]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #15701 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15701> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]` to the crate attributes to enable
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
= note: this compiler was built on YYYY-MM-DD; consider upgrading it if it is out of date
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
error: First Pass analysis includes:
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:18:5
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | / || {
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | let z1: &u8 = &foo.x;
... |
LL | | println!("({}, {})", z1, z2);
LL | | };
| |_____^
|
closure field capturing: don't depend on alignment of packed fields
2023-08-28 08:42:23 -05:00
note: Capturing foo[] -> ImmBorrow
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:21:24
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let z1: &u8 = &foo.x;
| ^^^^^
closure field capturing: don't depend on alignment of packed fields
2023-08-28 08:42:23 -05:00
note: Capturing foo[] -> MutBorrow
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:23:32
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let z2: &mut u8 = &mut foo.y;
| ^^^^^
error: Min Capture analysis includes:
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:18:5
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | / || {
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | let z1: &u8 = &foo.x;
... |
LL | | println!("({}, {})", z1, z2);
LL | | };
| |_____^
|
closure field capturing: don't depend on alignment of packed fields
2023-08-28 08:42:23 -05:00
note: Min Capture foo[] -> MutBorrow
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:23:32
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let z2: &mut u8 = &mut foo.y;
| ^^^^^
error: First Pass analysis includes:
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:49:5
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | / || {
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | let z1: &String = &foo.x;
... |
LL | | println!("({}, {})", z1, z2);
LL | | };
| |_____^
|
Flatten InferredCaptureInformation Min capture computation can already handle the same place appearing twice, and previous commits made CaptureInfo construction very cheap, so just delegate all work to min capture and let InferBorrowKind and process_collected_capture_information handle everything linearly.
2021-10-13 16:14:37 -05:00
note: Capturing foo[] -> ImmBorrow
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:52:28
Flatten InferredCaptureInformation Min capture computation can already handle the same place appearing twice, and previous commits made CaptureInfo construction very cheap, so just delegate all work to min capture and let InferBorrowKind and process_collected_capture_information handle everything linearly.
2021-10-13 16:14:37 -05:00
|
LL | let z1: &String = &foo.x;
| ^^^^^
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
note: Capturing foo[] -> MutBorrow
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:54:33
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let z2: &mut u16 = &mut foo.y;
| ^^^^^
error: Min Capture analysis includes:
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:49:5
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | / || {
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | let z1: &String = &foo.x;
... |
LL | | println!("({}, {})", z1, z2);
LL | | };
| |_____^
|
note: Min Capture foo[] -> MutBorrow
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:54:33
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let z2: &mut u16 = &mut foo.y;
| ^^^^^
error: First Pass analysis includes:
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:85:5
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | / || {
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | println!("{}", foo.x);
... |
LL | |
LL | | };
| |_____^
|
note: Capturing foo[] -> ImmBorrow
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:88:24
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | println!("{}", foo.x);
| ^^^^^
note: Capturing foo[(0, 0)] -> ByValue
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:92:18
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | let _z = foo.x;
| ^^^^^
error: Min Capture analysis includes:
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:85:5
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | / || {
LL | |
LL | |
LL | | println!("{}", foo.x);
... |
LL | |
LL | | };
| |_____^
|
note: Min Capture foo[] -> ByValue
Bless tests Update tests
2024-01-10 00:39:02 -06:00
--> $DIR/repr_packed.rs:88:24
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
|
LL | println!("{}", foo.x);
| ^^^^^ foo[] used here
...
LL | let _z = foo.x;
| ^^^^^ foo[] captured as ByValue here
Editon 2021 enables precise capture
2021-06-27 01:22:46 -05:00
error: aborting due to 9 previous errors
2229: Handle capturing a reference into a repr packed struct RFC 1240 states that it is unsafe to capture references into a packed-struct. This PR ensures that when a closure captures a precise path, we aren't violating this safety constraint. To acheive so we restrict the capture precision to the struct itself. An interesting edge case: ```rust struct Foo(String); let foo: Foo; let c = || { println!("{}", foo.0); let x = foo.0; } ``` Given how closures get desugared today, foo.0 will be moved into the closure, making the `println!`, safe. However this can be very subtle and also will be unsafe if the closure gets inline. Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/33
2021-03-06 20:47:53 -06:00
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink