mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
59a11af1f9
rust/tests/coverage-map/status-quo/inline-dead.cov-map

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

46 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Function name: inline_dead::dead (unused)
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
Raw bytes (9): 0x[01, 01, 00, 01, 00, 19, 01, 02, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 1
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 25, 1) to (start + 2, 2)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Function name: inline_dead::live::<false>
Raw bytes (28): 0x[01, 01, 02, 01, 05, 05, 02, 04, 01, 10, 01, 01, 09, 00, 02, 09, 00, 0f, 02, 02, 09, 00, 0a, 07, 02, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 2
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 16, 1) to (start + 1, 9)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 10)
= (c0 - c1)
- Code(Expression(1, Add)) at (prev + 2, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
= (c1 + (c0 - c1))
Function name: inline_dead::main
Raw bytes (16): 0x[01, 01, 01, 01, 00, 02, 01, 04, 01, 03, 0d, 03, 07, 06, 02, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 1
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Zero
Number of file 0 mappings: 2
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 4, 1) to (start + 3, 13)
- Code(Expression(0, Add)) at (prev + 7, 6) to (start + 2, 2)
= (c0 + Zero)
Function name: inline_dead::main::{closure#0}
Raw bytes (16): 0x[01, 01, 01, 01, 05, 02, 00, 09, 0d, 00, 0e, 03, 02, 05, 00, 06]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 1
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
Number of file 0 mappings: 2
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 9, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
- Code(Expression(0, Add)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 0, 6)
= (c0 + c1)
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink