rust/src/test/ui/suggestions/issue-51055-missing-semicolon-between-call-and-tuple.rs

fn vindictive() -> bool { true }

fn perfidy() -> (i32, i32) {
    vindictive() //~ ERROR expected function, found `bool`
    (1, 2)
}

fn main() {}
in which the E0618 "expected function" diagnostic gets a makeover Now the main span focuses on the erroneous not-a-function callee, while showing the entire call expression is relegated to a secondary span. In the case where the erroneous callee is itself a call, we point out the definition, and, if the call expression spans multiple lines, tentatively suggest a semicolon (because we suspect that the "outer" call is actually supposed to be a tuple). The new `bug!` assertion is, in fact, safe (`confirm_builtin_call` is only called by `check_call`, which is only called with a first arg of kind `ExprKind::Call` in `check_expr_kind`). Resolves #51055. 2018-11-10 22:46:05 -06:00			`fn vindictive() -> bool { true }`

			`fn perfidy() -> (i32, i32) {`
			vindictive() //~ ERROR expected function, found `bool`
			`(1, 2)`
			`}`

			`fn main() {}`