mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
52f7a218fb
rust/tests/ui/impl-trait/equality.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

42 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

warn against 'specialization' feature
2020-05-17 03:22:48 -05:00
warning: the feature `specialization` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/equality.rs:1:12
|
LL | #![feature(specialization)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #31844 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31844> for more information
Suggest minimal subset features in `incomplete_features` lint
2020-10-13 18:35:32 -05:00
= help: consider using `min_specialization` instead, which is more stable and complete
bless ui tests
2022-09-18 10:55:36 -05:00
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
warn against 'specialization' feature
2020-05-17 03:22:48 -05:00
Explicit help message for binop type missmatch When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message: ``` note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` ``` Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
2017-04-10 16:17:49 -05:00
error[E0308]: mismatched types
Remove licenses
2018-12-25 09:56:47 -06:00
--> $DIR/equality.rs:15:5
Explicit help message for binop type missmatch When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message: ``` note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` ``` Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
2017-04-10 16:17:49 -05:00
|
Eagerly merge hidden types.
2022-01-26 08:47:03 -06:00
LL | fn two(x: bool) -> impl Foo {
Resolve vars before emitting coerce error
2022-08-03 22:05:57 -05:00
| -------- expected `i32` because of return type
Revert "Auto merge of #93893 - oli-obk:sad_revert, r=oli-obk" This reverts commit 6499c5e7fc173a3f55b7a3bd1e6a50e9edef782d, reversing changes made to 78450d2d602b06d9b94349aaf8cece1a4acaf3a8.
2022-02-14 10:10:22 -06:00
...
Update UI tests
2018-02-22 18:42:32 -06:00
LL | 0_u32
Surround types with backticks in type errors
2019-11-15 11:37:01 -06:00
| ^^^^^ expected `i32`, found `u32`
Resolve vars before emitting coerce error
2022-08-03 22:05:57 -05:00
|
help: change the type of the numeric literal from `u32` to `i32`
|
LL | 0_i32
| ~~~
Explicit help message for binop type missmatch When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message: ``` note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` ``` Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
2017-04-10 16:17:49 -05:00
Add filtering options to `rustc_on_unimplemented` - filter error on the evaluated value of `Self` - filter error on the evaluated value of the type arguments - add argument to include custom note in diagnostic - allow the parser to parse `Self` when processing attributes - add custom message to binops
2018-01-19 21:57:10 -06:00
error[E0277]: cannot add `impl Foo` to `u32`
Remove licenses
2018-12-25 09:56:47 -06:00
--> $DIR/equality.rs:24:11
Explicit help message for binop type missmatch When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message: ``` note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` ``` Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
2017-04-10 16:17:49 -05:00
|
Update UI tests
2018-02-22 18:42:32 -06:00
LL | n + sum_to(n - 1)
tests: fix fallout from changing the span of binop errors.
2017-05-29 06:55:54 -05:00
| ^ no implementation for `u32 + impl Foo`
Explicit help message for binop type missmatch When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message: ``` note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` ``` Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
2017-04-10 16:17:49 -05:00
|
pretty: trim paths of unique symbols If a symbol name can only be imported from one place for a type, and as long as it was not glob-imported anywhere in the current crate, we can trim its printed path and print only the name. This has wide implications on error messages with types, for example, shortening `std::vec::Vec` to just `Vec`, as long as there is no other `Vec` importable anywhere. This adds a new '-Z trim-diagnostic-paths=false' option to control this feature. On the good path, with no diagnosis printed, we should try to avoid issuing this query, so we need to prevent trimmed_def_paths query on several cases. This change also relies on a previous commit that differentiates between `Debug` and `Display` on various rustc types, where the latter is trimmed and presented to the user and the former is not.
2020-09-02 02:40:56 -05:00
= help: the trait `Add<impl Foo>` is not implemented for `u32`
Refer to the TraitRef::identity in the message to be clearer
2022-03-26 21:02:07 -05:00
= help: the following other types implement trait `Add<Rhs>`:
Tweak "the following other types implement trait" When *any* of the suggested impls is an exact match, *only* show the exact matches. This is particularly relevant for integer types. fix fmt
2022-12-05 16:24:48 -06:00
<&'a u32 as Add<u32>>
<&u32 as Add<&u32>>
<u32 as Add<&u32>>
<u32 as Add>
Explicit help message for binop type missmatch When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message: ``` note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` ``` Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
2017-04-10 16:17:49 -05:00
skip pointing out ambuguous impls in alloc/std crates too
2022-01-29 17:34:06 -06:00
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors; 1 warning emitted
Explicit help message for binop type missmatch When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message: ``` note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` ``` Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
2017-04-10 16:17:49 -05:00
skip pointing out ambuguous impls in alloc/std crates too
2022-01-29 17:34:06 -06:00
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0277, E0308.
update tests
2018-03-03 08:59:40 -06:00
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink