rust/tests/ui/match/issue-92100.stderr

error[E0425]: cannot find value `a` in this scope
  --> $DIR/issue-92100.rs:5:10
   |
LL |         [a.., a] => {}
   |          ^ not found in this scope
   |
help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `a`, use the at operator
   |
LL |         [a @ .., a] => {}
   |            +

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
Visit patterns' literal expressions before binding new idents 2021-12-23 18:03:30 -06:00			error[E0425]: cannot find value `a` in this scope
			`--> $DIR/issue-92100.rs:5:10`
			`\|`
			`LL \| [a.., a] => {}`
			`\| ^ not found in this scope`
On resolve error of `[rest..]`, suggest `[rest @ ..]` When writing a pattern to collect multiple entries of a slice in a single binding, it is easy to misremember or typo the appropriate syntax to do so, instead writing the experimental `X..` pattern syntax. When we encounter a resolve error because `X` isn't available, we suggest `X @ ..` as an alternative. ``` error[E0425]: cannot find value `rest` in this scope --> $DIR/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.rs:3:13 \| LL \| [1, rest..] => println!("{rest:?}"), \| ^^^^ not found in this scope \| help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `rest`, use the at operator \| LL \| [1, rest @ ..] => println!("{rest:?}"), \| + ``` Fix #88404. 2023-11-16 18:55:55 -06:00			`\|`
			help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `a`, use the at operator
			`\|`
			`LL \| [a @ .., a] => {}`
			`\| +`
Visit patterns' literal expressions before binding new idents 2021-12-23 18:03:30 -06:00
			`error: aborting due to previous error`

			For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.