rust/tests/ui/structs/struct-tuple-field-names.stderr

error[E0769]: tuple variant `E::S` written as struct variant
  --> $DIR/struct-tuple-field-names.rs:8:9
   |
LL |         E::S { 0, 1 } => {}
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead
   |
LL |         E::S(_, _) => {}
   |             ~~~~~~

error[E0769]: tuple variant `S` written as struct variant
  --> $DIR/struct-tuple-field-names.rs:13:9
   |
LL |         S { } => {}
   |         ^^^^^
   |
help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead
   |
LL |         S(_, _) => {}
   |          ~~~~~~

error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0769`.
Clarify error message and remove pretty printing in help suggestions. 2021-02-14 12:14:11 -06:00			error[E0769]: tuple variant `E::S` written as struct variant
Improve suggestion for tuple struct pattern matching errors. Currently, when a user uses a struct pattern to pattern match on a tuple struct, the errors we emit generally suggest adding fields using their field names, which are numbers. However, numbers are not valid identifiers, so the suggestions, which use the shorthand notation, are not valid syntax. This commit changes those errors to suggest using the actual tuple struct pattern syntax instead, which is a more actionable suggestion. 2021-01-20 20:49:11 -06:00			`--> $DIR/struct-tuple-field-names.rs:8:9`
			`\|`
			`LL \| E::S { 0, 1 } => {}`
Fix suggestion span and move suggestions into new subwindow. 2021-02-20 14:33:08 -06:00			`\| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^`
			`\|`
			`help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead`
			`\|`
			`LL \| E::S(_, _) => {}`
Modify structured suggestion output * On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format * When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline * Color highlight modified span 2021-06-21 21:07:19 -05:00			`\| ~~~~~~`
Improve suggestion for tuple struct pattern matching errors. Currently, when a user uses a struct pattern to pattern match on a tuple struct, the errors we emit generally suggest adding fields using their field names, which are numbers. However, numbers are not valid identifiers, so the suggestions, which use the shorthand notation, are not valid syntax. This commit changes those errors to suggest using the actual tuple struct pattern syntax instead, which is a more actionable suggestion. 2021-01-20 20:49:11 -06:00
			error[E0769]: tuple variant `S` written as struct variant
			`--> $DIR/struct-tuple-field-names.rs:13:9`
			`\|`
			`LL \| S { } => {}`
Fix suggestion span and move suggestions into new subwindow. 2021-02-20 14:33:08 -06:00			`\| ^^^^^`
			`\|`
			`help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead`
			`\|`
			`LL \| S(_, _) => {}`
Modify structured suggestion output * On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format * When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline * Color highlight modified span 2021-06-21 21:07:19 -05:00			`\| ~~~~~~`
Improve suggestion for tuple struct pattern matching errors. Currently, when a user uses a struct pattern to pattern match on a tuple struct, the errors we emit generally suggest adding fields using their field names, which are numbers. However, numbers are not valid identifiers, so the suggestions, which use the shorthand notation, are not valid syntax. This commit changes those errors to suggest using the actual tuple struct pattern syntax instead, which is a more actionable suggestion. 2021-01-20 20:49:11 -06:00
			`error: aborting due to 2 previous errors`

			For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0769`.