rust/tests/ui/redundant_closure_call_fixable.fixed

131 lines
2.4 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

#![feature(async_closure)]
#![warn(clippy::redundant_closure_call)]
2023-03-04 10:28:53 -06:00
#![allow(clippy::redundant_async_block)]
#![allow(clippy::type_complexity)]
#![allow(unused)]
async fn something() -> u32 {
21
}
async fn something_else() -> u32 {
2
}
fn main() {
let a = 42;
let b = async {
let x = something().await;
let y = something_else().await;
x * y
};
let c = {
let x = 21;
let y = 2;
x * y
};
let d = async { something().await };
macro_rules! m {
() => {
0
};
}
macro_rules! m2 {
() => {
m!()
};
}
m2!();
issue9956();
}
fn issue9956() {
assert_eq!(43, 42);
// ... and some more interesting cases I've found while implementing the fix
// not actually immediately calling the closure:
let a = (|| 42);
dbg!(a());
// immediately calling it inside of a macro
dbg!(42);
// immediately calling only one closure, so we can't remove the other ones
let a = (|| || 123);
dbg!(a()());
// nested async closures
let a = async { 1 };
let h = async { a.await };
// macro expansion tests
macro_rules! echo {
($e:expr) => {
$e
};
}
let a = 1;
assert_eq!(a, 1);
let a = 123;
assert_eq!(a, 123);
// chaining calls, but not closures
fn x() -> fn() -> fn() -> fn() -> i32 {
|| || || 42
}
let _ = x()()()();
fn bar() -> fn(i32, i32) {
foo
}
fn foo(_: i32, _: i32) {}
bar()(42, 5);
foo(42, 5);
}
2023-11-27 08:43:39 -06:00
async fn issue11357() {
async {}.await;
2023-11-27 08:43:39 -06:00
}
mod issue11707 {
use core::future::Future;
fn spawn_on(fut: impl Future<Output = ()>) {}
fn demo() {
spawn_on(async move {});
2023-11-27 08:43:39 -06:00
}
}
fn avoid_double_parens() {
std::convert::identity(13_i32 + 36_i32).leading_zeros();
}
fn fp_11274() {
macro_rules! m {
($closure:expr) => {
$closure(1)
};
}
m!(|x| println!("{x}"));
}
// Issue #12358: When a macro expands into a closure, immediately calling the expanded closure
// triggers the lint.
fn issue_12358() {
macro_rules! make_closure {
() => {
(|| || {})
};
(x) => {
make_closure!()()
};
}
// The lint would suggest to alter the line below to `make_closure!(x)`, which is semantically
// different.
make_closure!(x)();
}