rust/src/libcollections/lib.rs

120 lines
2.8 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2013-2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
2014-08-04 05:48:39 -05:00
//! Collection types.
2014-10-05 12:32:18 -05:00
//!
//! See [std::collections](../std/collections) for a detailed discussion of collections in Rust.
2014-10-05 12:32:18 -05:00
#![crate_name = "collections"]
#![experimental]
#![crate_type = "rlib"]
#![license = "MIT/ASL2"]
#![doc(html_logo_url = "http://www.rust-lang.org/logos/rust-logo-128x128-blk-v2.png",
html_favicon_url = "http://www.rust-lang.org/favicon.ico",
html_root_url = "http://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/",
html_playground_url = "http://play.rust-lang.org/")]
#![allow(unknown_features)]
#![feature(macro_rules, default_type_params, phase, globs)]
#![feature(unsafe_destructor, import_shadowing, slicing_syntax)]
std: Recreate a `collections` module As with the previous commit with `librand`, this commit shuffles around some `collections` code. The new state of the world is similar to that of librand: * The libcollections crate now only depends on libcore and liballoc. * The standard library has a new module, `std::collections`. All functionality of libcollections is reexported through this module. I would like to stress that this change is purely cosmetic. There are very few alterations to these primitives. There are a number of notable points about the new organization: * std::{str, slice, string, vec} all moved to libcollections. There is no reason that these primitives shouldn't be necessarily usable in a freestanding context that has allocation. These are all reexported in their usual places in the standard library. * The `hashmap`, and transitively the `lru_cache`, modules no longer reside in `libcollections`, but rather in libstd. The reason for this is because the `HashMap::new` contructor requires access to the OSRng for initially seeding the hash map. Beyond this requirement, there is no reason that the hashmap could not move to libcollections. I do, however, have a plan to move the hash map to the collections module. The `HashMap::new` function could be altered to require that the `H` hasher parameter ascribe to the `Default` trait, allowing the entire `hashmap` module to live in libcollections. The key idea would be that the default hasher would be different in libstd. Something along the lines of: // src/libstd/collections/mod.rs pub type HashMap<K, V, H = RandomizedSipHasher> = core_collections::HashMap<K, V, H>; This is not possible today because you cannot invoke static methods through type aliases. If we modified the compiler, however, to allow invocation of static methods through type aliases, then this type definition would essentially be switching the default hasher from `SipHasher` in libcollections to a libstd-defined `RandomizedSipHasher` type. This type's `Default` implementation would randomly seed the `SipHasher` instance, and otherwise perform the same as `SipHasher`. This future state doesn't seem incredibly far off, but until that time comes, the hashmap module will live in libstd to not compromise on functionality. * In preparation for the hashmap moving to libcollections, the `hash` module has moved from libstd to libcollections. A previously snapshotted commit enables a distinct `Writer` trait to live in the `hash` module which `Hash` implementations are now parameterized over. Due to using a custom trait, the `SipHasher` implementation has lost its specialized methods for writing integers. These can be re-added backwards-compatibly in the future via default methods if necessary, but the FNV hashing should satisfy much of the need for speedier hashing. A list of breaking changes: * HashMap::{get, get_mut} no longer fails with the key formatted into the error message with `{:?}`, instead, a generic message is printed. With backtraces, it should still be not-too-hard to track down errors. * The HashMap, HashSet, and LruCache types are now available through std::collections instead of the collections crate. * Manual implementations of hash should be parameterized over `hash::Writer` instead of just `Writer`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-29 20:50:12 -05:00
#![no_std]
2014-06-11 20:47:09 -05:00
#[phase(plugin, link)] extern crate core;
Add libunicode; move unicode functions from core - created new crate, libunicode, below libstd - split Char trait into Char (libcore) and UnicodeChar (libunicode) - Unicode-aware functions now live in libunicode - is_alphabetic, is_XID_start, is_XID_continue, is_lowercase, is_uppercase, is_whitespace, is_alphanumeric, is_control, is_digit, to_uppercase, to_lowercase - added width method in UnicodeChar trait - determines printed width of character in columns, or None if it is a non-NULL control character - takes a boolean argument indicating whether the present context is CJK or not (characters with 'A'mbiguous widths are double-wide in CJK contexts, single-wide otherwise) - split StrSlice into StrSlice (libcore) and UnicodeStrSlice (libunicode) - functionality formerly in StrSlice that relied upon Unicode functionality from Char is now in UnicodeStrSlice - words, is_whitespace, is_alphanumeric, trim, trim_left, trim_right - also moved Words type alias into libunicode because words method is in UnicodeStrSlice - unified Unicode tables from libcollections, libcore, and libregex into libunicode - updated unicode.py in src/etc to generate aforementioned tables - generated new tables based on latest Unicode data - added UnicodeChar and UnicodeStrSlice traits to prelude - libunicode is now the collection point for the std::char module, combining the libunicode functionality with the Char functionality from libcore - thus, moved doc comment for char from core::char to unicode::char - libcollections remains the collection point for std::str The Unicode-aware functions that previously lived in the Char and StrSlice traits are no longer available to programs that only use libcore. To regain use of these methods, include the libunicode crate and use the UnicodeChar and/or UnicodeStrSlice traits: extern crate unicode; use unicode::UnicodeChar; use unicode::UnicodeStrSlice; use unicode::Words; // if you want to use the words() method NOTE: this does *not* impact programs that use libstd, since UnicodeChar and UnicodeStrSlice have been added to the prelude. closes #15224 [breaking-change]
2014-06-30 16:04:10 -05:00
extern crate unicode;
std: Recreate a `collections` module As with the previous commit with `librand`, this commit shuffles around some `collections` code. The new state of the world is similar to that of librand: * The libcollections crate now only depends on libcore and liballoc. * The standard library has a new module, `std::collections`. All functionality of libcollections is reexported through this module. I would like to stress that this change is purely cosmetic. There are very few alterations to these primitives. There are a number of notable points about the new organization: * std::{str, slice, string, vec} all moved to libcollections. There is no reason that these primitives shouldn't be necessarily usable in a freestanding context that has allocation. These are all reexported in their usual places in the standard library. * The `hashmap`, and transitively the `lru_cache`, modules no longer reside in `libcollections`, but rather in libstd. The reason for this is because the `HashMap::new` contructor requires access to the OSRng for initially seeding the hash map. Beyond this requirement, there is no reason that the hashmap could not move to libcollections. I do, however, have a plan to move the hash map to the collections module. The `HashMap::new` function could be altered to require that the `H` hasher parameter ascribe to the `Default` trait, allowing the entire `hashmap` module to live in libcollections. The key idea would be that the default hasher would be different in libstd. Something along the lines of: // src/libstd/collections/mod.rs pub type HashMap<K, V, H = RandomizedSipHasher> = core_collections::HashMap<K, V, H>; This is not possible today because you cannot invoke static methods through type aliases. If we modified the compiler, however, to allow invocation of static methods through type aliases, then this type definition would essentially be switching the default hasher from `SipHasher` in libcollections to a libstd-defined `RandomizedSipHasher` type. This type's `Default` implementation would randomly seed the `SipHasher` instance, and otherwise perform the same as `SipHasher`. This future state doesn't seem incredibly far off, but until that time comes, the hashmap module will live in libstd to not compromise on functionality. * In preparation for the hashmap moving to libcollections, the `hash` module has moved from libstd to libcollections. A previously snapshotted commit enables a distinct `Writer` trait to live in the `hash` module which `Hash` implementations are now parameterized over. Due to using a custom trait, the `SipHasher` implementation has lost its specialized methods for writing integers. These can be re-added backwards-compatibly in the future via default methods if necessary, but the FNV hashing should satisfy much of the need for speedier hashing. A list of breaking changes: * HashMap::{get, get_mut} no longer fails with the key formatted into the error message with `{:?}`, instead, a generic message is printed. With backtraces, it should still be not-too-hard to track down errors. * The HashMap, HashSet, and LruCache types are now available through std::collections instead of the collections crate. * Manual implementations of hash should be parameterized over `hash::Writer` instead of just `Writer`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-29 20:50:12 -05:00
extern crate alloc;
2014-02-13 19:49:11 -06:00
#[cfg(test)] extern crate test;
2014-06-11 20:47:09 -05:00
#[cfg(test)] #[phase(plugin, link)] extern crate std;
#[cfg(test)] #[phase(plugin, link)] extern crate log;
pub use binary_heap::BinaryHeap;
pub use bitv::Bitv;
pub use bitv_set::BitvSet;
pub use btree_map::BTreeMap;
pub use btree_set::BTreeSet;
pub use dlist::DList;
2014-02-20 00:10:41 -06:00
pub use enum_set::EnumSet;
pub use ring_buf::RingBuf;
pub use string::String;
pub use tree_map::TreeMap;
pub use tree_set::TreeSet;
pub use trie_map::TrieMap;
pub use trie_set::TrieSet;
pub use vec::Vec;
pub use vec_map::VecMap;
std: Recreate a `collections` module As with the previous commit with `librand`, this commit shuffles around some `collections` code. The new state of the world is similar to that of librand: * The libcollections crate now only depends on libcore and liballoc. * The standard library has a new module, `std::collections`. All functionality of libcollections is reexported through this module. I would like to stress that this change is purely cosmetic. There are very few alterations to these primitives. There are a number of notable points about the new organization: * std::{str, slice, string, vec} all moved to libcollections. There is no reason that these primitives shouldn't be necessarily usable in a freestanding context that has allocation. These are all reexported in their usual places in the standard library. * The `hashmap`, and transitively the `lru_cache`, modules no longer reside in `libcollections`, but rather in libstd. The reason for this is because the `HashMap::new` contructor requires access to the OSRng for initially seeding the hash map. Beyond this requirement, there is no reason that the hashmap could not move to libcollections. I do, however, have a plan to move the hash map to the collections module. The `HashMap::new` function could be altered to require that the `H` hasher parameter ascribe to the `Default` trait, allowing the entire `hashmap` module to live in libcollections. The key idea would be that the default hasher would be different in libstd. Something along the lines of: // src/libstd/collections/mod.rs pub type HashMap<K, V, H = RandomizedSipHasher> = core_collections::HashMap<K, V, H>; This is not possible today because you cannot invoke static methods through type aliases. If we modified the compiler, however, to allow invocation of static methods through type aliases, then this type definition would essentially be switching the default hasher from `SipHasher` in libcollections to a libstd-defined `RandomizedSipHasher` type. This type's `Default` implementation would randomly seed the `SipHasher` instance, and otherwise perform the same as `SipHasher`. This future state doesn't seem incredibly far off, but until that time comes, the hashmap module will live in libstd to not compromise on functionality. * In preparation for the hashmap moving to libcollections, the `hash` module has moved from libstd to libcollections. A previously snapshotted commit enables a distinct `Writer` trait to live in the `hash` module which `Hash` implementations are now parameterized over. Due to using a custom trait, the `SipHasher` implementation has lost its specialized methods for writing integers. These can be re-added backwards-compatibly in the future via default methods if necessary, but the FNV hashing should satisfy much of the need for speedier hashing. A list of breaking changes: * HashMap::{get, get_mut} no longer fails with the key formatted into the error message with `{:?}`, instead, a generic message is printed. With backtraces, it should still be not-too-hard to track down errors. * The HashMap, HashSet, and LruCache types are now available through std::collections instead of the collections crate. * Manual implementations of hash should be parameterized over `hash::Writer` instead of just `Writer`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-29 20:50:12 -05:00
mod macros;
pub mod binary_heap;
mod bit;
mod btree;
pub mod dlist;
2014-02-20 00:10:41 -06:00
pub mod enum_set;
pub mod ring_buf;
mod tree;
mod trie;
std: Recreate a `collections` module As with the previous commit with `librand`, this commit shuffles around some `collections` code. The new state of the world is similar to that of librand: * The libcollections crate now only depends on libcore and liballoc. * The standard library has a new module, `std::collections`. All functionality of libcollections is reexported through this module. I would like to stress that this change is purely cosmetic. There are very few alterations to these primitives. There are a number of notable points about the new organization: * std::{str, slice, string, vec} all moved to libcollections. There is no reason that these primitives shouldn't be necessarily usable in a freestanding context that has allocation. These are all reexported in their usual places in the standard library. * The `hashmap`, and transitively the `lru_cache`, modules no longer reside in `libcollections`, but rather in libstd. The reason for this is because the `HashMap::new` contructor requires access to the OSRng for initially seeding the hash map. Beyond this requirement, there is no reason that the hashmap could not move to libcollections. I do, however, have a plan to move the hash map to the collections module. The `HashMap::new` function could be altered to require that the `H` hasher parameter ascribe to the `Default` trait, allowing the entire `hashmap` module to live in libcollections. The key idea would be that the default hasher would be different in libstd. Something along the lines of: // src/libstd/collections/mod.rs pub type HashMap<K, V, H = RandomizedSipHasher> = core_collections::HashMap<K, V, H>; This is not possible today because you cannot invoke static methods through type aliases. If we modified the compiler, however, to allow invocation of static methods through type aliases, then this type definition would essentially be switching the default hasher from `SipHasher` in libcollections to a libstd-defined `RandomizedSipHasher` type. This type's `Default` implementation would randomly seed the `SipHasher` instance, and otherwise perform the same as `SipHasher`. This future state doesn't seem incredibly far off, but until that time comes, the hashmap module will live in libstd to not compromise on functionality. * In preparation for the hashmap moving to libcollections, the `hash` module has moved from libstd to libcollections. A previously snapshotted commit enables a distinct `Writer` trait to live in the `hash` module which `Hash` implementations are now parameterized over. Due to using a custom trait, the `SipHasher` implementation has lost its specialized methods for writing integers. These can be re-added backwards-compatibly in the future via default methods if necessary, but the FNV hashing should satisfy much of the need for speedier hashing. A list of breaking changes: * HashMap::{get, get_mut} no longer fails with the key formatted into the error message with `{:?}`, instead, a generic message is printed. With backtraces, it should still be not-too-hard to track down errors. * The HashMap, HashSet, and LruCache types are now available through std::collections instead of the collections crate. * Manual implementations of hash should be parameterized over `hash::Writer` instead of just `Writer`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-29 20:50:12 -05:00
pub mod slice;
pub mod str;
pub mod string;
pub mod vec;
pub mod hash;
pub mod vec_map;
pub mod bitv {
pub use bit::{Bitv, Bits, from_fn, from_bytes};
}
pub mod bitv_set {
pub use bit::{BitvSet, BitPositions, TwoBitPositions};
}
pub mod tree_map {
pub use tree::map::*;
}
pub mod tree_set {
pub use tree::set::*;
}
pub mod trie_map {
pub use trie::map::*;
}
pub mod trie_set {
pub use trie::set::*;
}
pub mod btree_map {
pub use btree::map::*;
}
pub mod btree_set {
pub use btree::set::*;
}
std: Recreate a `collections` module As with the previous commit with `librand`, this commit shuffles around some `collections` code. The new state of the world is similar to that of librand: * The libcollections crate now only depends on libcore and liballoc. * The standard library has a new module, `std::collections`. All functionality of libcollections is reexported through this module. I would like to stress that this change is purely cosmetic. There are very few alterations to these primitives. There are a number of notable points about the new organization: * std::{str, slice, string, vec} all moved to libcollections. There is no reason that these primitives shouldn't be necessarily usable in a freestanding context that has allocation. These are all reexported in their usual places in the standard library. * The `hashmap`, and transitively the `lru_cache`, modules no longer reside in `libcollections`, but rather in libstd. The reason for this is because the `HashMap::new` contructor requires access to the OSRng for initially seeding the hash map. Beyond this requirement, there is no reason that the hashmap could not move to libcollections. I do, however, have a plan to move the hash map to the collections module. The `HashMap::new` function could be altered to require that the `H` hasher parameter ascribe to the `Default` trait, allowing the entire `hashmap` module to live in libcollections. The key idea would be that the default hasher would be different in libstd. Something along the lines of: // src/libstd/collections/mod.rs pub type HashMap<K, V, H = RandomizedSipHasher> = core_collections::HashMap<K, V, H>; This is not possible today because you cannot invoke static methods through type aliases. If we modified the compiler, however, to allow invocation of static methods through type aliases, then this type definition would essentially be switching the default hasher from `SipHasher` in libcollections to a libstd-defined `RandomizedSipHasher` type. This type's `Default` implementation would randomly seed the `SipHasher` instance, and otherwise perform the same as `SipHasher`. This future state doesn't seem incredibly far off, but until that time comes, the hashmap module will live in libstd to not compromise on functionality. * In preparation for the hashmap moving to libcollections, the `hash` module has moved from libstd to libcollections. A previously snapshotted commit enables a distinct `Writer` trait to live in the `hash` module which `Hash` implementations are now parameterized over. Due to using a custom trait, the `SipHasher` implementation has lost its specialized methods for writing integers. These can be re-added backwards-compatibly in the future via default methods if necessary, but the FNV hashing should satisfy much of the need for speedier hashing. A list of breaking changes: * HashMap::{get, get_mut} no longer fails with the key formatted into the error message with `{:?}`, instead, a generic message is printed. With backtraces, it should still be not-too-hard to track down errors. * The HashMap, HashSet, and LruCache types are now available through std::collections instead of the collections crate. * Manual implementations of hash should be parameterized over `hash::Writer` instead of just `Writer`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-29 20:50:12 -05:00
#[cfg(test)] mod bench;
std: Recreate a `collections` module As with the previous commit with `librand`, this commit shuffles around some `collections` code. The new state of the world is similar to that of librand: * The libcollections crate now only depends on libcore and liballoc. * The standard library has a new module, `std::collections`. All functionality of libcollections is reexported through this module. I would like to stress that this change is purely cosmetic. There are very few alterations to these primitives. There are a number of notable points about the new organization: * std::{str, slice, string, vec} all moved to libcollections. There is no reason that these primitives shouldn't be necessarily usable in a freestanding context that has allocation. These are all reexported in their usual places in the standard library. * The `hashmap`, and transitively the `lru_cache`, modules no longer reside in `libcollections`, but rather in libstd. The reason for this is because the `HashMap::new` contructor requires access to the OSRng for initially seeding the hash map. Beyond this requirement, there is no reason that the hashmap could not move to libcollections. I do, however, have a plan to move the hash map to the collections module. The `HashMap::new` function could be altered to require that the `H` hasher parameter ascribe to the `Default` trait, allowing the entire `hashmap` module to live in libcollections. The key idea would be that the default hasher would be different in libstd. Something along the lines of: // src/libstd/collections/mod.rs pub type HashMap<K, V, H = RandomizedSipHasher> = core_collections::HashMap<K, V, H>; This is not possible today because you cannot invoke static methods through type aliases. If we modified the compiler, however, to allow invocation of static methods through type aliases, then this type definition would essentially be switching the default hasher from `SipHasher` in libcollections to a libstd-defined `RandomizedSipHasher` type. This type's `Default` implementation would randomly seed the `SipHasher` instance, and otherwise perform the same as `SipHasher`. This future state doesn't seem incredibly far off, but until that time comes, the hashmap module will live in libstd to not compromise on functionality. * In preparation for the hashmap moving to libcollections, the `hash` module has moved from libstd to libcollections. A previously snapshotted commit enables a distinct `Writer` trait to live in the `hash` module which `Hash` implementations are now parameterized over. Due to using a custom trait, the `SipHasher` implementation has lost its specialized methods for writing integers. These can be re-added backwards-compatibly in the future via default methods if necessary, but the FNV hashing should satisfy much of the need for speedier hashing. A list of breaking changes: * HashMap::{get, get_mut} no longer fails with the key formatted into the error message with `{:?}`, instead, a generic message is printed. With backtraces, it should still be not-too-hard to track down errors. * The HashMap, HashSet, and LruCache types are now available through std::collections instead of the collections crate. * Manual implementations of hash should be parameterized over `hash::Writer` instead of just `Writer`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-29 20:50:12 -05:00
// FIXME(#14344) this shouldn't be necessary
#[doc(hidden)]
pub fn fixme_14344_be_sure_to_link_to_collections() {}
#[cfg(not(test))]
std: Recreate a `collections` module As with the previous commit with `librand`, this commit shuffles around some `collections` code. The new state of the world is similar to that of librand: * The libcollections crate now only depends on libcore and liballoc. * The standard library has a new module, `std::collections`. All functionality of libcollections is reexported through this module. I would like to stress that this change is purely cosmetic. There are very few alterations to these primitives. There are a number of notable points about the new organization: * std::{str, slice, string, vec} all moved to libcollections. There is no reason that these primitives shouldn't be necessarily usable in a freestanding context that has allocation. These are all reexported in their usual places in the standard library. * The `hashmap`, and transitively the `lru_cache`, modules no longer reside in `libcollections`, but rather in libstd. The reason for this is because the `HashMap::new` contructor requires access to the OSRng for initially seeding the hash map. Beyond this requirement, there is no reason that the hashmap could not move to libcollections. I do, however, have a plan to move the hash map to the collections module. The `HashMap::new` function could be altered to require that the `H` hasher parameter ascribe to the `Default` trait, allowing the entire `hashmap` module to live in libcollections. The key idea would be that the default hasher would be different in libstd. Something along the lines of: // src/libstd/collections/mod.rs pub type HashMap<K, V, H = RandomizedSipHasher> = core_collections::HashMap<K, V, H>; This is not possible today because you cannot invoke static methods through type aliases. If we modified the compiler, however, to allow invocation of static methods through type aliases, then this type definition would essentially be switching the default hasher from `SipHasher` in libcollections to a libstd-defined `RandomizedSipHasher` type. This type's `Default` implementation would randomly seed the `SipHasher` instance, and otherwise perform the same as `SipHasher`. This future state doesn't seem incredibly far off, but until that time comes, the hashmap module will live in libstd to not compromise on functionality. * In preparation for the hashmap moving to libcollections, the `hash` module has moved from libstd to libcollections. A previously snapshotted commit enables a distinct `Writer` trait to live in the `hash` module which `Hash` implementations are now parameterized over. Due to using a custom trait, the `SipHasher` implementation has lost its specialized methods for writing integers. These can be re-added backwards-compatibly in the future via default methods if necessary, but the FNV hashing should satisfy much of the need for speedier hashing. A list of breaking changes: * HashMap::{get, get_mut} no longer fails with the key formatted into the error message with `{:?}`, instead, a generic message is printed. With backtraces, it should still be not-too-hard to track down errors. * The HashMap, HashSet, and LruCache types are now available through std::collections instead of the collections crate. * Manual implementations of hash should be parameterized over `hash::Writer` instead of just `Writer`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-29 20:50:12 -05:00
mod std {
pub use core::fmt; // necessary for panic!()
pub use core::option; // necessary for panic!()
std: Recreate a `collections` module As with the previous commit with `librand`, this commit shuffles around some `collections` code. The new state of the world is similar to that of librand: * The libcollections crate now only depends on libcore and liballoc. * The standard library has a new module, `std::collections`. All functionality of libcollections is reexported through this module. I would like to stress that this change is purely cosmetic. There are very few alterations to these primitives. There are a number of notable points about the new organization: * std::{str, slice, string, vec} all moved to libcollections. There is no reason that these primitives shouldn't be necessarily usable in a freestanding context that has allocation. These are all reexported in their usual places in the standard library. * The `hashmap`, and transitively the `lru_cache`, modules no longer reside in `libcollections`, but rather in libstd. The reason for this is because the `HashMap::new` contructor requires access to the OSRng for initially seeding the hash map. Beyond this requirement, there is no reason that the hashmap could not move to libcollections. I do, however, have a plan to move the hash map to the collections module. The `HashMap::new` function could be altered to require that the `H` hasher parameter ascribe to the `Default` trait, allowing the entire `hashmap` module to live in libcollections. The key idea would be that the default hasher would be different in libstd. Something along the lines of: // src/libstd/collections/mod.rs pub type HashMap<K, V, H = RandomizedSipHasher> = core_collections::HashMap<K, V, H>; This is not possible today because you cannot invoke static methods through type aliases. If we modified the compiler, however, to allow invocation of static methods through type aliases, then this type definition would essentially be switching the default hasher from `SipHasher` in libcollections to a libstd-defined `RandomizedSipHasher` type. This type's `Default` implementation would randomly seed the `SipHasher` instance, and otherwise perform the same as `SipHasher`. This future state doesn't seem incredibly far off, but until that time comes, the hashmap module will live in libstd to not compromise on functionality. * In preparation for the hashmap moving to libcollections, the `hash` module has moved from libstd to libcollections. A previously snapshotted commit enables a distinct `Writer` trait to live in the `hash` module which `Hash` implementations are now parameterized over. Due to using a custom trait, the `SipHasher` implementation has lost its specialized methods for writing integers. These can be re-added backwards-compatibly in the future via default methods if necessary, but the FNV hashing should satisfy much of the need for speedier hashing. A list of breaking changes: * HashMap::{get, get_mut} no longer fails with the key formatted into the error message with `{:?}`, instead, a generic message is printed. With backtraces, it should still be not-too-hard to track down errors. * The HashMap, HashSet, and LruCache types are now available through std::collections instead of the collections crate. * Manual implementations of hash should be parameterized over `hash::Writer` instead of just `Writer`. [breaking-change]
2014-05-29 20:50:12 -05:00
pub use core::clone; // deriving(Clone)
pub use core::cmp; // deriving(Eq, Ord, etc.)
pub use hash; // deriving(Hash)
}