rust/src/etc/vim/ftplugin/rust.vim

133 lines
4.7 KiB
VimL
Raw Normal View History

" Language: Rust
" Description: Vim syntax file for Rust
" Maintainer: Chris Morgan <me@chrismorgan.info>
" Maintainer: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
" Last Change: May 27, 2014
if exists("b:did_ftplugin")
finish
endif
let b:did_ftplugin = 1
let s:save_cpo = &cpo
set cpo&vim
" Variables {{{1
" The rust source code at present seems to typically omit a leader on /*!
" comments, so we'll use that as our default, but make it easy to switch.
" This does not affect indentation at all (I tested it with and without
" leader), merely whether a leader is inserted by default or not.
if exists("g:rust_bang_comment_leader") && g:rust_bang_comment_leader == 1
" Why is the `,s0:/*,mb:\ ,ex:*/` there, you ask? I don't understand why,
" but without it, */ gets indented one space even if there were no
" leaders. I'm fairly sure that's a Vim bug.
setlocal comments=s1:/*,mb:*,ex:*/,s0:/*,mb:\ ,ex:*/,:///,://!,://
else
setlocal comments=s0:/*!,m:\ ,ex:*/,s1:/*,mb:*,ex:*/,:///,://!,://
endif
setlocal commentstring=//%s
setlocal formatoptions-=t formatoptions+=croqnl
" j was only added in 7.3.541, so stop complaints about its nonexistence
silent! setlocal formatoptions+=j
" This includeexpr isn't perfect, but it's a good start
setlocal includeexpr=substitute(v:fname,'::','/','g')
" NOT adding .rc as it's being phased out (0.7)
setlocal suffixesadd=.rs
if exists("g:ftplugin_rust_source_path")
let &l:path=g:ftplugin_rust_source_path . ',' . &l:path
endif
if exists("g:loaded_delimitMate")
if exists("b:delimitMate_excluded_regions")
let b:rust_original_delimitMate_excluded_regions = b:delimitMate_excluded_regions
endif
let b:delimitMate_excluded_regions = delimitMate#Get("excluded_regions") . ',rustLifetimeCandidate,rustGenericLifetimeCandidate'
endif
" Motion Commands {{{1
Fix Vim section movements for standard Rust style. (Expressed another way: make `[[` et al. work with the curly brace at the end of a line as is standard Rust style, not just at the start is it is by default in Vim, from K&R style.) This came out of #11492, where a simpler but less effective technique was initially proposed; some discussion of the techniques, ways and means can be found there. There are still a few caveats: - Operator-pending mode behaves differently to the standard behaviour: if inside curly braces, it should delete up to and including the closing of the outermost curly brace (that doesn't seem to me consistent with documented behaviour, but it's what it does). Actual behaviour (the more logical and consistent, in my opinion): up to the start of the next outermost curly brace. - With folding enabled (`set fdm=syntax`), `[[` and `]]` do not behave as they should: the default behaviour treats an entire closed fold as one line for these purposes while this code does not (I explicitly `set nofoldenable` in the function—the side-effects are worse with folds enabled), leading to unexpected behaviour, the worst of which is `[[` and/or `]]` not working in visual mode on a closed fold (visual mode keeps it at the extreme end of the region line of the folded region, so it's always going back to the opening line of that fold and immediately being shoved back to the end by visual mode). - `[[` and `]]` are operating inside comments, whereas the standard behaviour skips comments. - The viewport position is sometimes changed when it should not be necessary.
2014-02-27 16:54:54 +11:00
" Bind motion commands to support hanging indents
nnoremap <silent> <buffer> [[ :call rust#Jump('n', 'Back')<CR>
nnoremap <silent> <buffer> ]] :call rust#Jump('n', 'Forward')<CR>
xnoremap <silent> <buffer> [[ :call rust#Jump('v', 'Back')<CR>
xnoremap <silent> <buffer> ]] :call rust#Jump('v', 'Forward')<CR>
onoremap <silent> <buffer> [[ :call rust#Jump('o', 'Back')<CR>
onoremap <silent> <buffer> ]] :call rust#Jump('o', 'Forward')<CR>
" Commands {{{1
" :Run will compile and run the current file. If it has unsaved changes, they
" will be saved first. If it has no path, it will be written to a temporary
" file first. The generated binary is always placed in a temporary directory,
" but run from the current directory.
"
" The arguments passed to :Run will be passed to the generated binary.
"
" If ! is specified, the arguments are given to rustc as well. A -- argument
" separates rustc args from the args passed to the binary.
"
" If g:rustc_path is defined, it is used as the path to rustc. Otherwise it is
" assumed that rustc is in $PATH.
command! -nargs=* -complete=file -bang -bar -buffer Run call rust#Run(<bang>0, [<f-args>])
" :Expand will expand the current file using --pretty.
"
" Any arguments given to :Expand will be passed to rustc. This is largely so
" you can pass various --cfg configurations.
"
" If ! is specified, the first argument will be interpreted as the --pretty
" type. Otherwise it will default to 'expanded'.
"
" If the current file has unsaved changes, it will be saved first. If it's an
" unnamed buffer, it will be written to a temporary file.
"
" If g:rustc_path is defined, it is used as the path to rustc. Otherwise it is
" assumed that rustc is in $PATH.
command! -nargs=* -complete=customlist,rust#CompleteExpand -bang -bar -buffer Expand call rust#Expand(<bang>0, [<f-args>])
" Mappings {{{1
" Bind ⌘R in MacVim to :Run
nnoremap <silent> <buffer> <D-r> :Run<CR>
" Bind ⌘⇧R in MacVim to :Run! pre-filled with the last args
nnoremap <buffer> <D-R> :Run! <C-r>=join(b:rust_last_rustc_args)<CR><C-\>erust#AppendCmdLine(' -- ' . join(b:rust_last_args))<CR>
if !exists("b:rust_last_rustc_args") || !exists("b:rust_last_args")
let b:rust_last_rustc_args = []
let b:rust_last_args = []
endif
" Cleanup {{{1
Fix Vim section movements for standard Rust style. (Expressed another way: make `[[` et al. work with the curly brace at the end of a line as is standard Rust style, not just at the start is it is by default in Vim, from K&R style.) This came out of #11492, where a simpler but less effective technique was initially proposed; some discussion of the techniques, ways and means can be found there. There are still a few caveats: - Operator-pending mode behaves differently to the standard behaviour: if inside curly braces, it should delete up to and including the closing of the outermost curly brace (that doesn't seem to me consistent with documented behaviour, but it's what it does). Actual behaviour (the more logical and consistent, in my opinion): up to the start of the next outermost curly brace. - With folding enabled (`set fdm=syntax`), `[[` and `]]` do not behave as they should: the default behaviour treats an entire closed fold as one line for these purposes while this code does not (I explicitly `set nofoldenable` in the function—the side-effects are worse with folds enabled), leading to unexpected behaviour, the worst of which is `[[` and/or `]]` not working in visual mode on a closed fold (visual mode keeps it at the extreme end of the region line of the folded region, so it's always going back to the opening line of that fold and immediately being shoved back to the end by visual mode). - `[[` and `]]` are operating inside comments, whereas the standard behaviour skips comments. - The viewport position is sometimes changed when it should not be necessary.
2014-02-27 16:54:54 +11:00
let b:undo_ftplugin = "
\setlocal formatoptions< comments< commentstring< includeexpr< suffixesadd<
\|if exists('b:rust_original_delimitMate_excluded_regions')
\|let b:delimitMate_excluded_regions = b:rust_original_delimitMate_excluded_regions
\|unlet b:rust_original_delimitMate_excluded_regions
\|else
\|unlet! b:delimitMate_excluded_regions
Fix Vim section movements for standard Rust style. (Expressed another way: make `[[` et al. work with the curly brace at the end of a line as is standard Rust style, not just at the start is it is by default in Vim, from K&R style.) This came out of #11492, where a simpler but less effective technique was initially proposed; some discussion of the techniques, ways and means can be found there. There are still a few caveats: - Operator-pending mode behaves differently to the standard behaviour: if inside curly braces, it should delete up to and including the closing of the outermost curly brace (that doesn't seem to me consistent with documented behaviour, but it's what it does). Actual behaviour (the more logical and consistent, in my opinion): up to the start of the next outermost curly brace. - With folding enabled (`set fdm=syntax`), `[[` and `]]` do not behave as they should: the default behaviour treats an entire closed fold as one line for these purposes while this code does not (I explicitly `set nofoldenable` in the function—the side-effects are worse with folds enabled), leading to unexpected behaviour, the worst of which is `[[` and/or `]]` not working in visual mode on a closed fold (visual mode keeps it at the extreme end of the region line of the folded region, so it's always going back to the opening line of that fold and immediately being shoved back to the end by visual mode). - `[[` and `]]` are operating inside comments, whereas the standard behaviour skips comments. - The viewport position is sometimes changed when it should not be necessary.
2014-02-27 16:54:54 +11:00
\|endif
\|unlet! b:rust_last_rustc_args b:rust_last_args
\|delcommand Run
\|delcommand Expand
\|nunmap <buffer> <D-r>
\|nunmap <buffer> <D-R>
Fix Vim section movements for standard Rust style. (Expressed another way: make `[[` et al. work with the curly brace at the end of a line as is standard Rust style, not just at the start is it is by default in Vim, from K&R style.) This came out of #11492, where a simpler but less effective technique was initially proposed; some discussion of the techniques, ways and means can be found there. There are still a few caveats: - Operator-pending mode behaves differently to the standard behaviour: if inside curly braces, it should delete up to and including the closing of the outermost curly brace (that doesn't seem to me consistent with documented behaviour, but it's what it does). Actual behaviour (the more logical and consistent, in my opinion): up to the start of the next outermost curly brace. - With folding enabled (`set fdm=syntax`), `[[` and `]]` do not behave as they should: the default behaviour treats an entire closed fold as one line for these purposes while this code does not (I explicitly `set nofoldenable` in the function—the side-effects are worse with folds enabled), leading to unexpected behaviour, the worst of which is `[[` and/or `]]` not working in visual mode on a closed fold (visual mode keeps it at the extreme end of the region line of the folded region, so it's always going back to the opening line of that fold and immediately being shoved back to the end by visual mode). - `[[` and `]]` are operating inside comments, whereas the standard behaviour skips comments. - The viewport position is sometimes changed when it should not be necessary.
2014-02-27 16:54:54 +11:00
\|nunmap <buffer> [[
\|nunmap <buffer> ]]
\|xunmap <buffer> [[
\|xunmap <buffer> ]]
\|ounmap <buffer> [[
\|ounmap <buffer> ]]
\"
" }}}1
Fix Vim section movements for standard Rust style. (Expressed another way: make `[[` et al. work with the curly brace at the end of a line as is standard Rust style, not just at the start is it is by default in Vim, from K&R style.) This came out of #11492, where a simpler but less effective technique was initially proposed; some discussion of the techniques, ways and means can be found there. There are still a few caveats: - Operator-pending mode behaves differently to the standard behaviour: if inside curly braces, it should delete up to and including the closing of the outermost curly brace (that doesn't seem to me consistent with documented behaviour, but it's what it does). Actual behaviour (the more logical and consistent, in my opinion): up to the start of the next outermost curly brace. - With folding enabled (`set fdm=syntax`), `[[` and `]]` do not behave as they should: the default behaviour treats an entire closed fold as one line for these purposes while this code does not (I explicitly `set nofoldenable` in the function—the side-effects are worse with folds enabled), leading to unexpected behaviour, the worst of which is `[[` and/or `]]` not working in visual mode on a closed fold (visual mode keeps it at the extreme end of the region line of the folded region, so it's always going back to the opening line of that fold and immediately being shoved back to the end by visual mode). - `[[` and `]]` are operating inside comments, whereas the standard behaviour skips comments. - The viewport position is sometimes changed when it should not be necessary.
2014-02-27 16:54:54 +11:00
let &cpo = s:save_cpo
unlet s:save_cpo
" vim: set noet sw=4 ts=4: