mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
2d45df3caa
rust/tests/coverage-map/status-quo/unused.cov-map

95 lines
4.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Function name: unused::foo::<f32>
Raw bytes (42): 0x[01, 01, 04, 01, 0f, 05, 09, 03, 0d, 05, 09, 06, 01, 03, 01, 01, 12, 03, 02, 0b, 00, 11, 0a, 01, 09, 00, 0f, 09, 00, 13, 00, 19, 0f, 01, 09, 00, 0f, 0d, 02, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 4
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Expression(3, Add)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Counter(3)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(2)
Number of file 0 mappings: 6
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 1, 18)
- Code(Expression(0, Add)) at (prev + 2, 11) to (start + 0, 17)
= (c0 + (c1 + c2))
- Code(Expression(2, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
= ((c0 + (c1 + c2)) - c3)
- Code(Counter(2)) at (prev + 0, 19) to (start + 0, 25)
- Code(Expression(3, Add)) at (prev + 1, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
= (c1 + c2)
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 2, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
Function name: unused::foo::<u32>
Raw bytes (42): 0x[01, 01, 04, 01, 0f, 05, 09, 03, 0d, 05, 09, 06, 01, 03, 01, 01, 12, 03, 02, 0b, 00, 11, 0a, 01, 09, 00, 0f, 09, 00, 13, 00, 19, 0f, 01, 09, 00, 0f, 0d, 02, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 4
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Expression(3, Add)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Add), rhs = Counter(3)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(2)
Number of file 0 mappings: 6
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 1, 18)
- Code(Expression(0, Add)) at (prev + 2, 11) to (start + 0, 17)
= (c0 + (c1 + c2))
- Code(Expression(2, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
= ((c0 + (c1 + c2)) - c3)
- Code(Counter(2)) at (prev + 0, 19) to (start + 0, 25)
- Code(Expression(3, Add)) at (prev + 1, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
= (c1 + c2)
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 2, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
Function name: unused::main
Raw bytes (9): 0x[01, 01, 00, 01, 01, 25, 01, 04, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 1
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 37, 1) to (start + 4, 2)
Function name: unused::unused_func (unused)
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
Raw bytes (24): 0x[01, 01, 00, 04, 00, 13, 01, 01, 0e, 00, 01, 0f, 02, 06, 00, 02, 06, 00, 07, 00, 01, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 19, 1) to (start + 1, 14)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 15) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 6) to (start + 0, 7)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
Function name: unused::unused_func2 (unused)
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
Raw bytes (24): 0x[01, 01, 00, 04, 00, 19, 01, 01, 0e, 00, 01, 0f, 02, 06, 00, 02, 06, 00, 07, 00, 01, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 25, 1) to (start + 1, 14)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 15) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 6) to (start + 0, 7)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
Function name: unused::unused_func3 (unused)
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
Raw bytes (24): 0x[01, 01, 00, 04, 00, 1f, 01, 01, 0e, 00, 01, 0f, 02, 06, 00, 02, 06, 00, 07, 00, 01, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 4
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 31, 1) to (start + 1, 14)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 15) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 6) to (start + 0, 7)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
Function name: unused::unused_template_func::<_> (unused)
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
Raw bytes (34): 0x[01, 01, 00, 06, 00, 0b, 01, 01, 12, 00, 02, 0b, 00, 11, 00, 01, 09, 00, 0f, 00, 00, 13, 00, 19, 00, 01, 09, 00, 0f, 00, 02, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 0
Number of file 0 mappings: 6
coverage: Mappings for unused functions can all be zero There is no need to include a dummy counter reference in the coverage mappings for an unused function.
2023-09-07 04:58:11 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 11, 1) to (start + 1, 18)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 11) to (start + 0, 17)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 0, 19) to (start + 0, 25)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 9) to (start + 0, 15)
- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink