mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
25d183057e
rust/tests/coverage/lazy_boolean.cov-map

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

50 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Function name: lazy_boolean::main
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
Raw bytes (158): 0x[01, 01, 07, 01, 05, 01, 09, 01, 0d, 01, 19, 01, 1d, 01, 21, 01, 25, 1c, 01, 04, 01, 07, 0f, 05, 07, 10, 04, 06, 02, 04, 06, 00, 07, 01, 02, 09, 00, 11, 01, 02, 0d, 00, 12, 06, 02, 0d, 00, 12, 01, 03, 09, 00, 11, 01, 02, 0d, 00, 12, 0a, 02, 0d, 00, 12, 01, 02, 09, 00, 11, 01, 00, 14, 00, 19, 11, 00, 1d, 00, 22, 01, 01, 09, 00, 11, 01, 00, 14, 00, 19, 15, 00, 1d, 00, 22, 01, 03, 09, 01, 10, 0e, 02, 05, 03, 06, 19, 03, 06, 00, 07, 01, 03, 09, 00, 10, 1d, 01, 05, 03, 06, 12, 05, 05, 03, 06, 01, 05, 08, 00, 10, 16, 00, 11, 02, 06, 21, 02, 06, 00, 07, 01, 02, 08, 00, 0f, 25, 00, 10, 02, 06, 1a, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 01, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
Number of expressions: 7
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(3)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(6)
- expression 4 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(7)
- expression 5 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(8)
- expression 6 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(9)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Number of file 0 mappings: 28
coverage: Add `#[rustfmt::skip]` to tests with non-standard formatting These tests deliberately use non-standard formatting, so that the line execution counts reported by `llvm-cov` reveal additional information about where code regions begin and end.
2024-01-15 20:40:01 -06:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 4, 1) to (start + 7, 15)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 7, 16) to (start + 4, 6)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 4, 6) to (start + 0, 7)
= (c0 - c1)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 17)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 18)
- Code(Expression(1, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 18)
= (c0 - c2)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 9) to (start + 0, 17)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 18)
- Code(Expression(2, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 13) to (start + 0, 18)
= (c0 - c3)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 17)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 0, 20) to (start + 0, 25)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Counter(4)) at (prev + 0, 29) to (start + 0, 34)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 1, 9) to (start + 0, 17)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 0, 20) to (start + 0, 25)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Counter(5)) at (prev + 0, 29) to (start + 0, 34)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 9) to (start + 1, 16)
- Code(Expression(3, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 5) to (start + 3, 6)
= (c0 - c6)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Counter(6)) at (prev + 3, 6) to (start + 0, 7)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 9) to (start + 0, 16)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Counter(7)) at (prev + 1, 5) to (start + 3, 6)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- Code(Expression(4, Sub)) at (prev + 5, 5) to (start + 3, 6)
= (c0 - c7)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 5, 8) to (start + 0, 16)
- Code(Expression(5, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 17) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c0 - c8)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Counter(8)) at (prev + 2, 6) to (start + 0, 7)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 2, 8) to (start + 0, 15)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
- Code(Counter(9)) at (prev + 0, 16) to (start + 2, 6)
coverage: Simplify counter expressions using simple algebra Some of these cases currently don't occur in practice, but are included for completeness, and to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage start building more complex expressions.
2024-05-13 22:51:24 -05:00
- Code(Expression(6, Sub)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c0 - c9)
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
Copy most of `tests/run-coverage` into `tests/coverage-map/status-quo` The output of these tests is too complicated to comfortably verify by hand, but we can still use them to observe changes to the underlying mappings produced by codegen/LLVM. If these tests fail due to non-coverage changes (e.g. in HIR-to-MIR lowering or MIR optimizations), it should usually be OK to just `--bless` them, as long as the `run-coverage` test suite still works.
2023-08-14 06:29:41 -05:00
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink