mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
240a7dd02e
rust/tests/rustdoc-ui/intra-doc/reference-links.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

15 lines
415 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Revert "Cleanup markdown span handling" This caused a diagnostic regression, originally it was: ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:3:10 | 3 | //! [a]: std::process::Comman | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` | = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` but after that PR rustdoc now displays ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:1:14 | 1 | //! Links to [a] [link][a] | ^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` | = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` which IMO is much less clear.
2020-12-26 08:47:11 -06:00
error: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman`
--> $DIR/reference-links.rs:5:10
|
LL | //! [a]: std::process::Comman
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process`
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/reference-links.rs:2:9
|
Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in. - Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2020-12-29 22:16:16 -06:00
LL | #![deny(rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Revert "Cleanup markdown span handling" This caused a diagnostic regression, originally it was: ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:3:10 | 3 | //! [a]: std::process::Comman | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` | = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` but after that PR rustdoc now displays ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:1:14 | 1 | //! Links to [a] [link][a] | ^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` | = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` which IMO is much less clear.
2020-12-26 08:47:11 -06:00
Only report reference-style link errors once Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
2020-10-12 09:52:20 -05:00
error: aborting due to previous error
Revert "Cleanup markdown span handling" This caused a diagnostic regression, originally it was: ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:3:10 | 3 | //! [a]: std::process::Comman | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` | = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` but after that PR rustdoc now displays ``` warning: unresolved link to `std::process::Comman` --> link.rs:1:14 | 1 | //! Links to [a] [link][a] | ^^^ no item named `Comman` in module `process` | = note: `#[warn(broken_intra_doc_links)]` on by default ``` which IMO is much less clear.
2020-12-26 08:47:11 -06:00
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink