2022-03-04 13:46:56 +11:00
|
|
|
use crate::stable_hasher::{HashStable, StableHasher};
|
2022-02-04 14:26:29 +11:00
|
|
|
use std::cmp::Ordering;
|
|
|
|
use std::hash::{Hash, Hasher};
|
|
|
|
use std::ops::Deref;
|
|
|
|
use std::ptr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mod private {
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
|
|
|
|
pub struct PrivateZst;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// A reference to a value that is interned, and is known to be unique.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Note that it is possible to have a `T` and a `Interned<T>` that are (or
|
|
|
|
/// refer to) equal but different values. But if you have two different
|
|
|
|
/// `Interned<T>`s, they both refer to the same value, at a single location in
|
|
|
|
/// memory. This means that equality and hashing can be done on the value's
|
|
|
|
/// address rather than the value's contents, which can improve performance.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// The `PrivateZst` field means you can pattern match with `Interned(v, _)`
|
|
|
|
/// but you can only construct a `Interned` with `new_unchecked`, and not
|
|
|
|
/// directly.
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Debug)]
|
2022-02-23 08:06:22 -05:00
|
|
|
#[rustc_pass_by_value]
|
2022-02-04 14:26:29 +11:00
|
|
|
pub struct Interned<'a, T>(pub &'a T, pub private::PrivateZst);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, T> Interned<'a, T> {
|
|
|
|
/// Create a new `Interned` value. The value referred to *must* be interned
|
|
|
|
/// and thus be unique, and it *must* remain unique in the future. This
|
|
|
|
/// function has `_unchecked` in the name but is not `unsafe`, because if
|
|
|
|
/// the uniqueness condition is violated condition it will cause incorrect
|
|
|
|
/// behaviour but will not affect memory safety.
|
|
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
|
|
pub const fn new_unchecked(t: &'a T) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
Interned(t, private::PrivateZst)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, T> Clone for Interned<'a, T> {
|
|
|
|
fn clone(&self) -> Self {
|
|
|
|
*self
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, T> Copy for Interned<'a, T> {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, T> Deref for Interned<'a, T> {
|
|
|
|
type Target = T;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
|
|
fn deref(&self) -> &T {
|
|
|
|
self.0
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, T> PartialEq for Interned<'a, T> {
|
|
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
|
|
fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
// Pointer equality implies equality, due to the uniqueness constraint.
|
|
|
|
ptr::eq(self.0, other.0)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, T> Eq for Interned<'a, T> {}
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce `ConstAllocation`.
Currently some `Allocation`s are interned, some are not, and it's very
hard to tell at a use point which is which.
This commit introduces `ConstAllocation` for the known-interned ones,
which makes the division much clearer. `ConstAllocation::inner()` is
used to get the underlying `Allocation`.
In some places it's natural to use an `Allocation`, in some it's natural
to use a `ConstAllocation`, and in some places there's no clear choice.
I've tried to make things look as nice as possible, while generally
favouring `ConstAllocation`, which is the type that embodies more
information. This does require quite a few calls to `inner()`.
The commit also tweaks how `PartialOrd` works for `Interned`. The
previous code was too clever by half, building on `T: Ord` to make the
code shorter. That caused problems with deriving `PartialOrd` and `Ord`
for `ConstAllocation`, so I changed it to build on `T: PartialOrd`,
which is slightly more verbose but much more standard and avoided the
problems.
2022-03-02 07:15:04 +11:00
|
|
|
impl<'a, T: PartialOrd> PartialOrd for Interned<'a, T> {
|
2022-02-04 14:26:29 +11:00
|
|
|
fn partial_cmp(&self, other: &Interned<'a, T>) -> Option<Ordering> {
|
Introduce `ConstAllocation`.
Currently some `Allocation`s are interned, some are not, and it's very
hard to tell at a use point which is which.
This commit introduces `ConstAllocation` for the known-interned ones,
which makes the division much clearer. `ConstAllocation::inner()` is
used to get the underlying `Allocation`.
In some places it's natural to use an `Allocation`, in some it's natural
to use a `ConstAllocation`, and in some places there's no clear choice.
I've tried to make things look as nice as possible, while generally
favouring `ConstAllocation`, which is the type that embodies more
information. This does require quite a few calls to `inner()`.
The commit also tweaks how `PartialOrd` works for `Interned`. The
previous code was too clever by half, building on `T: Ord` to make the
code shorter. That caused problems with deriving `PartialOrd` and `Ord`
for `ConstAllocation`, so I changed it to build on `T: PartialOrd`,
which is slightly more verbose but much more standard and avoided the
problems.
2022-03-02 07:15:04 +11:00
|
|
|
// Pointer equality implies equality, due to the uniqueness constraint,
|
|
|
|
// but the contents must be compared otherwise.
|
|
|
|
if ptr::eq(self.0, other.0) {
|
|
|
|
Some(Ordering::Equal)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2022-11-29 11:01:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let res = self.0.partial_cmp(other.0);
|
Introduce `ConstAllocation`.
Currently some `Allocation`s are interned, some are not, and it's very
hard to tell at a use point which is which.
This commit introduces `ConstAllocation` for the known-interned ones,
which makes the division much clearer. `ConstAllocation::inner()` is
used to get the underlying `Allocation`.
In some places it's natural to use an `Allocation`, in some it's natural
to use a `ConstAllocation`, and in some places there's no clear choice.
I've tried to make things look as nice as possible, while generally
favouring `ConstAllocation`, which is the type that embodies more
information. This does require quite a few calls to `inner()`.
The commit also tweaks how `PartialOrd` works for `Interned`. The
previous code was too clever by half, building on `T: Ord` to make the
code shorter. That caused problems with deriving `PartialOrd` and `Ord`
for `ConstAllocation`, so I changed it to build on `T: PartialOrd`,
which is slightly more verbose but much more standard and avoided the
problems.
2022-03-02 07:15:04 +11:00
|
|
|
debug_assert_ne!(res, Some(Ordering::Equal));
|
|
|
|
res
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-02-04 14:26:29 +11:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, T: Ord> Ord for Interned<'a, T> {
|
|
|
|
fn cmp(&self, other: &Interned<'a, T>) -> Ordering {
|
|
|
|
// Pointer equality implies equality, due to the uniqueness constraint,
|
|
|
|
// but the contents must be compared otherwise.
|
|
|
|
if ptr::eq(self.0, other.0) {
|
|
|
|
Ordering::Equal
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2022-11-29 11:01:17 +00:00
|
|
|
let res = self.0.cmp(other.0);
|
2022-02-08 14:12:29 +11:00
|
|
|
debug_assert_ne!(res, Ordering::Equal);
|
2022-02-04 14:26:29 +11:00
|
|
|
res
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, T> Hash for Interned<'a, T> {
|
|
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
|
|
fn hash<H: Hasher>(&self, s: &mut H) {
|
|
|
|
// Pointer hashing is sufficient, due to the uniqueness constraint.
|
|
|
|
ptr::hash(self.0, s)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-04 13:46:56 +11:00
|
|
|
impl<T, CTX> HashStable<CTX> for Interned<'_, T>
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
T: HashStable<CTX>,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
fn hash_stable(&self, hcx: &mut CTX, hasher: &mut StableHasher) {
|
|
|
|
self.0.hash_stable(hcx, hasher);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-04 14:26:29 +11:00
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
|
|
mod tests;
|