rust/src/open_options.rs

186 lines
6.8 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
use rustc::lint::*;
use rustc_front::hir::{Expr, ExprMethodCall, ExprLit};
use utils::{walk_ptrs_ty_depth, match_type, span_lint, OPEN_OPTIONS_PATH};
use syntax::codemap::{Span, Spanned};
use syntax::ast::Lit_::LitBool;
/// **What it does:** This lint checks for duplicate open options as well as combinations that make no sense. It is `Warn` by default.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** In the best case, the code will be harder to read than necessary. I don't know the worst case.
///
/// **Known problems:** None
///
/// **Example:** `OpenOptions::new().read(true).truncate(true)`
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
declare_lint! {
pub NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS,
Warn,
2015-10-07 10:15:44 -05:00
"nonsensical combination of options for opening a file"
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
}
#[derive(Copy,Clone)]
pub struct NonSensicalOpenOptions;
impl LintPass for NonSensicalOpenOptions {
fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
lint_array!(NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS)
}
}
impl LateLintPass for NonSensicalOpenOptions {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext, e: &Expr) {
if let ExprMethodCall(ref name, _, ref arguments) = e.node {
let (obj_ty, _) = walk_ptrs_ty_depth(cx.tcx.expr_ty(&arguments[0]));
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
if name.node.as_str() == "open" && match_type(cx, obj_ty, &OPEN_OPTIONS_PATH) {
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
let mut options = Vec::new();
get_open_options(cx, &arguments[0], &mut options);
check_open_options(cx, &options, e.span);
}
}
}
}
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy)]
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
enum Argument {
True,
False,
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
Unknown,
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
}
#[derive(Debug)]
enum OpenOption {
2015-10-07 10:15:44 -05:00
Write,
Read,
Truncate,
Create,
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
Append,
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
}
2015-10-07 10:15:44 -05:00
fn get_open_options(cx: &LateContext, argument: &Expr, options: &mut Vec<(OpenOption, Argument)>) {
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
if let ExprMethodCall(ref name, _, ref arguments) = argument.node {
let (obj_ty, _) = walk_ptrs_ty_depth(cx.tcx.expr_ty(&arguments[0]));
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
// Only proceed if this is a call on some object of type std::fs::OpenOptions
if match_type(cx, obj_ty, &OPEN_OPTIONS_PATH) && arguments.len() >= 2 {
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
let argument_option = match arguments[1].node {
ExprLit(ref span) => {
if let Spanned {node: LitBool(lit), ..} = **span {
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
if lit {
Argument::True
} else {
Argument::False
}
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
} else {
return; // The function is called with a literal
// which is not a boolean literal. This is theoretically
// possible, but not very likely.
}
}
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
_ => Argument::Unknown,
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
};
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
match &*name.node.as_str() {
"create" => {
2015-10-07 10:15:44 -05:00
options.push((OpenOption::Create, argument_option));
}
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
"append" => {
2015-10-07 10:15:44 -05:00
options.push((OpenOption::Append, argument_option));
}
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
"truncate" => {
2015-10-07 10:15:44 -05:00
options.push((OpenOption::Truncate, argument_option));
}
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
"read" => {
2015-10-07 10:15:44 -05:00
options.push((OpenOption::Read, argument_option));
}
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
"write" => {
2015-10-07 10:15:44 -05:00
options.push((OpenOption::Write, argument_option));
}
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
_ => {}
}
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
get_open_options(cx, &arguments[0], options);
}
}
}
fn check_open_options(cx: &LateContext, options: &[(OpenOption, Argument)], span: Span) {
let (mut create, mut append, mut truncate, mut read, mut write) = (false, false, false, false, false);
let (mut create_arg, mut append_arg, mut truncate_arg, mut read_arg, mut write_arg) = (false,
false,
false,
false,
false);
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
// This code is almost duplicated (oh, the irony), but I haven't found a way to unify it.
for option in options {
match *option {
(OpenOption::Create, arg) => {
if create {
span_lint(cx,
NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS,
span,
"The method \"create\" is called more than once");
} else {
create = true
}
create_arg = create_arg || (arg == Argument::True);;
}
(OpenOption::Append, arg) => {
if append {
span_lint(cx,
NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS,
span,
"The method \"append\" is called more than once");
} else {
append = true
}
append_arg = append_arg || (arg == Argument::True);;
}
(OpenOption::Truncate, arg) => {
if truncate {
span_lint(cx,
NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS,
span,
"The method \"truncate\" is called more than once");
} else {
truncate = true
}
truncate_arg = truncate_arg || (arg == Argument::True);
}
(OpenOption::Read, arg) => {
if read {
span_lint(cx,
NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS,
span,
"The method \"read\" is called more than once");
} else {
read = true
}
read_arg = read_arg || (arg == Argument::True);;
}
(OpenOption::Write, arg) => {
if write {
span_lint(cx,
NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS,
span,
"The method \"write\" is called more than once");
} else {
write = true
}
write_arg = write_arg || (arg == Argument::True);;
}
}
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
}
if read && truncate && read_arg && truncate_arg {
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
span_lint(cx, NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS, span, "File opened with \"truncate\" and \"read\"");
}
if append && truncate && append_arg && truncate_arg {
2016-01-03 22:26:12 -06:00
span_lint(cx,
NONSENSICAL_OPEN_OPTIONS,
span,
"File opened with \"append\" and \"truncate\"");
2015-10-07 06:15:14 -05:00
}
}