mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
11c7f632a2
rust/tests/ui/fmt/format-args-capture-first-literal-is-macro.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

31 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-01-05 13:17:30 -06:00
error: there is no argument named `a`
macro_rules: Preserve all metavariable spans in a global side table
2023-12-26 07:30:31 -06:00
--> $DIR/format-args-capture-first-literal-is-macro.rs:15:26
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-01-05 13:17:30 -06:00
|
LL | format!(identity_pm!("{a}"));
| ^^^^^
|
= note: did you intend to capture a variable `a` from the surrounding scope?
= note: to avoid ambiguity, `format_args!` cannot capture variables when the format string is expanded from a macro
error: there is no argument named `a`
macro_rules: Preserve all metavariable spans in a global side table
2023-12-26 07:30:31 -06:00
--> $DIR/format-args-capture-first-literal-is-macro.rs:17:27
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-01-05 13:17:30 -06:00
|
macro_rules: Preserve all metavariable spans in a global side table
2023-12-26 07:30:31 -06:00
LL | format!(identity_mbe!("{a}"));
| ^^^^^
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-01-05 13:17:30 -06:00
|
= note: did you intend to capture a variable `a` from the surrounding scope?
= note: to avoid ambiguity, `format_args!` cannot capture variables when the format string is expanded from a macro
error: there is no argument named `a`
--> $DIR/format-args-capture-first-literal-is-macro.rs:19:13
|
LL | format!(concat!("{a}"));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: did you intend to capture a variable `a` from the surrounding scope?
= note: to avoid ambiguity, `format_args!` cannot capture variables when the format string is expanded from a macro
= note: this error originates in the macro `concat` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink