mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
10b08e3c9c
rust/tests/ui/privacy/issue-79593.stderr

36 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-11 21:52:51 -06:00
error[E0063]: missing field `private` in initializer of `Pub`
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:10:9
|
LL | Pub {};
| ^^^ missing `private`
error[E0063]: missing field `y` in initializer of `Enum`
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:12:9
|
LL | Enum::Variant { x: () };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `y`
point at private fields in struct literal
2022-06-20 02:29:05 -05:00
error: cannot construct `Pub` with struct literal syntax due to private fields
Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-11 21:52:51 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:18:5
|
LL | foo::Pub {};
| ^^^^^^^^
point at private fields in struct literal
2022-06-20 02:29:05 -05:00
|
add "was" to pluralize macro and use it
2022-06-22 00:56:40 -05:00
= note: ... and other private field `private` that was not provided
Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-11 21:52:51 -06:00
error[E0063]: missing field `y` in initializer of `Enum`
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:23:5
|
LL | foo::Enum::Variant { x: () };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `y`
Make "missing field" error message more natural
2021-02-20 11:32:02 -06:00
error[E0063]: missing fields `x` and `y` in initializer of `Enum`
Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-11 21:52:51 -06:00
--> $DIR/issue-79593.rs:25:5
|
LL | foo::Enum::Variant { };
Make "missing field" error message more natural
2021-02-20 11:32:02 -06:00
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `x` and `y`
Resolve enum field visibility correctly Previously, this code treated enum fields' visibility as if they were struct fields. However, that's not correct because the visibility of a struct field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is private to the module it's defined in, whereas the visibility of an *enum* field with `ast::VisibilityKind::Inherited` is the visibility of the enum it belongs to.
2020-12-11 21:52:51 -06:00
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0063`.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink