2022-06-29 23:31:41 -05:00
|
|
|
// run-pass
|
2022-08-05 09:15:59 -05:00
|
|
|
// ignore-wasm
|
2022-06-29 23:31:41 -05:00
|
|
|
#![allow(dead_code)]
|
|
|
|
#![allow(improper_ctypes)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[link(name = "rust_test_helpers", kind = "static")]
|
|
|
|
extern "C" {
|
|
|
|
pub fn issue_97463_leak_uninit_data(a: u32, b: u32, c: u32) -> u16;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn main() {
|
|
|
|
const C1: usize = 0x327b23c6;
|
|
|
|
const C2: usize = C1 & 0xFFFF;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let r1: usize = 0x0;
|
|
|
|
let r2: usize = C1;
|
|
|
|
let r3: usize = 0x0;
|
|
|
|
let value: u16 = unsafe { issue_97463_leak_uninit_data(r1 as u32, r2 as u32, r3 as u32) };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: as an example of the sensitivity of this test to optimization choices,
|
2022-09-16 12:26:58 -05:00
|
|
|
// uncommenting this block of code makes the bug go away on pnkfelix's machine.
|
2022-06-29 23:31:41 -05:00
|
|
|
// (But observing via `dbg!` doesn't hide the bug. At least sometimes.)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
println!("{}", value);
|
|
|
|
println!("{}", value as usize);
|
|
|
|
println!("{}", usize::from(value));
|
|
|
|
println!("{}", (value as usize) & 0xFFFF);
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let d1 = value;
|
|
|
|
let d2 = value as usize;
|
|
|
|
let d3 = usize::from(value);
|
|
|
|
let d4 = (value as usize) & 0xFFFF;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let d = (&d1, &d2, &d3, &d4);
|
|
|
|
let d_ = (d1, d2, d3, d4);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(((&(C2 as u16), &C2, &C2, &C2), (C2 as u16, C2, C2, C2)), (d, d_));
|
|
|
|
}
|