rust/src/libcore/alloc.rs

1233 lines
49 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

//! Memory allocation APIs
#![stable(feature = "alloc_module", since = "1.28.0")]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
2019-04-14 21:23:21 -05:00
use crate::cmp;
use crate::fmt;
use crate::mem;
use crate::usize;
use crate::ptr::{self, NonNull};
use crate::num::NonZeroUsize;
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// Represents the combination of a starting address and
/// a total capacity of the returned block.
#[unstable(feature = "allocator_api", issue = "32838")]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct Excess(pub NonNull<u8>, pub usize);
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
fn size_align<T>() -> (usize, usize) {
(mem::size_of::<T>(), mem::align_of::<T>())
}
/// Layout of a block of memory.
///
/// An instance of `Layout` describes a particular layout of memory.
/// You build a `Layout` up as an input to give to an allocator.
///
/// All layouts have an associated non-negative size and a
/// power-of-two alignment.
///
/// (Note however that layouts are *not* required to have positive
/// size, even though many allocators require that all memory
2017-08-10 17:16:18 -05:00
/// requests have positive size. A caller to the `Alloc::alloc`
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// method must either ensure that conditions like this are met, or
/// use specific allocators with looser requirements.)
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
2018-08-01 08:37:38 -05:00
#[lang = "alloc_layout"]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
pub struct Layout {
// size of the requested block of memory, measured in bytes.
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
size_: usize,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
// alignment of the requested block of memory, measured in bytes.
// we ensure that this is always a power-of-two, because API's
// like `posix_memalign` require it and it is a reasonable
// constraint to impose on Layout constructors.
//
// (However, we do not analogously require `align >= sizeof(void*)`,
// even though that is *also* a requirement of `posix_memalign`.)
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
align_: NonZeroUsize,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
impl Layout {
/// Constructs a `Layout` from a given `size` and `align`,
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// or returns `LayoutErr` if either of the following conditions
/// are not met:
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// * `align` must not be zero,
///
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// * `align` must be a power of two,
///
/// * `size`, when rounded up to the nearest multiple of `align`,
/// must not overflow (i.e., the rounded value must be less than
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// `usize::MAX`).
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
#[inline]
pub fn from_size_align(size: usize, align: usize) -> Result<Self, LayoutErr> {
if !align.is_power_of_two() {
return Err(LayoutErr { private: () });
}
// (power-of-two implies align != 0.)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
// Rounded up size is:
// size_rounded_up = (size + align - 1) & !(align - 1);
//
// We know from above that align != 0. If adding (align - 1)
// does not overflow, then rounding up will be fine.
//
// Conversely, &-masking with !(align - 1) will subtract off
// only low-order-bits. Thus if overflow occurs with the sum,
// the &-mask cannot subtract enough to undo that overflow.
//
// Above implies that checking for summation overflow is both
// necessary and sufficient.
if size > usize::MAX - (align - 1) {
return Err(LayoutErr { private: () });
}
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
unsafe {
Ok(Layout::from_size_align_unchecked(size, align))
}
}
/// Creates a layout, bypassing all checks.
///
/// # Safety
///
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// This function is unsafe as it does not verify the preconditions from
/// [`Layout::from_size_align`](#method.from_size_align).
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
#[inline]
pub unsafe fn from_size_align_unchecked(size: usize, align: usize) -> Self {
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
Layout { size_: size, align_: NonZeroUsize::new_unchecked(align) }
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// The minimum size in bytes for a memory block of this layout.
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
#[inline]
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
pub fn size(&self) -> usize { self.size_ }
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// The minimum byte alignment for a memory block of this layout.
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
#[inline]
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
pub fn align(&self) -> usize { self.align_.get() }
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// Constructs a `Layout` suitable for holding a value of type `T`.
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
#[inline]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
pub fn new<T>() -> Self {
let (size, align) = size_align::<T>();
// Note that the align is guaranteed by rustc to be a power of two and
// the size+align combo is guaranteed to fit in our address space. As a
// result use the unchecked constructor here to avoid inserting code
// that panics if it isn't optimized well enough.
debug_assert!(Layout::from_size_align(size, align).is_ok());
unsafe {
Layout::from_size_align_unchecked(size, align)
}
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// Produces layout describing a record that could be used to
/// allocate backing structure for `T` (which could be a trait
/// or other unsized type like a slice).
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
#[inline]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
pub fn for_value<T: ?Sized>(t: &T) -> Self {
let (size, align) = (mem::size_of_val(t), mem::align_of_val(t));
// See rationale in `new` for why this us using an unsafe variant below
debug_assert!(Layout::from_size_align(size, align).is_ok());
unsafe {
Layout::from_size_align_unchecked(size, align)
}
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// Creates a layout describing the record that can hold a value
/// of the same layout as `self`, but that also is aligned to
/// alignment `align` (measured in bytes).
///
/// If `self` already meets the prescribed alignment, then returns
/// `self`.
///
/// Note that this method does not add any padding to the overall
/// size, regardless of whether the returned layout has a different
/// alignment. In other words, if `K` has size 16, `K.align_to(32)`
/// will *still* have size 16.
///
/// Returns an error if the combination of `self.size()` and the given
/// `align` violates the conditions listed in
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// [`Layout::from_size_align`](#method.from_size_align).
#[unstable(feature = "alloc_layout_extra", issue = "55724")]
#[inline]
pub fn align_to(&self, align: usize) -> Result<Self, LayoutErr> {
Layout::from_size_align(self.size(), cmp::max(self.align(), align))
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// Returns the amount of padding we must insert after `self`
/// to ensure that the following address will satisfy `align`
/// (measured in bytes).
///
/// e.g., if `self.size()` is 9, then `self.padding_needed_for(4)`
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// returns 3, because that is the minimum number of bytes of
/// padding required to get a 4-aligned address (assuming that the
/// corresponding memory block starts at a 4-aligned address).
///
/// The return value of this function has no meaning if `align` is
/// not a power-of-two.
///
/// Note that the utility of the returned value requires `align`
/// to be less than or equal to the alignment of the starting
/// address for the whole allocated block of memory. One way to
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// satisfy this constraint is to ensure `align <= self.align()`.
#[unstable(feature = "alloc_layout_extra", issue = "55724")]
#[inline]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
pub fn padding_needed_for(&self, align: usize) -> usize {
let len = self.size();
// Rounded up value is:
// len_rounded_up = (len + align - 1) & !(align - 1);
// and then we return the padding difference: `len_rounded_up - len`.
//
// We use modular arithmetic throughout:
//
// 1. align is guaranteed to be > 0, so align - 1 is always
// valid.
//
// 2. `len + align - 1` can overflow by at most `align - 1`,
// so the &-mask wth `!(align - 1)` will ensure that in the
// case of overflow, `len_rounded_up` will itself be 0.
// Thus the returned padding, when added to `len`, yields 0,
// which trivially satisfies the alignment `align`.
//
// (Of course, attempts to allocate blocks of memory whose
// size and padding overflow in the above manner should cause
// the allocator to yield an error anyway.)
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
let len_rounded_up = len.wrapping_add(align).wrapping_sub(1)
& !align.wrapping_sub(1);
len_rounded_up.wrapping_sub(len)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// Creates a layout by rounding the size of this layout up to a multiple
/// of the layout's alignment.
///
/// Returns `Err` if the padded size would overflow.
///
/// This is equivalent to adding the result of `padding_needed_for`
/// to the layout's current size.
#[unstable(feature = "alloc_layout_extra", issue = "55724")]
#[inline]
pub fn pad_to_align(&self) -> Result<Layout, LayoutErr> {
let pad = self.padding_needed_for(self.align());
let new_size = self.size().checked_add(pad)
.ok_or(LayoutErr { private: () })?;
Layout::from_size_align(new_size, self.align())
}
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// Creates a layout describing the record for `n` instances of
/// `self`, with a suitable amount of padding between each to
/// ensure that each instance is given its requested size and
/// alignment. On success, returns `(k, offs)` where `k` is the
/// layout of the array and `offs` is the distance between the start
/// of each element in the array.
///
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// On arithmetic overflow, returns `LayoutErr`.
#[unstable(feature = "alloc_layout_extra", issue = "55724")]
#[inline]
pub fn repeat(&self, n: usize) -> Result<(Self, usize), LayoutErr> {
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
let padded_size = self.size().checked_add(self.padding_needed_for(self.align()))
.ok_or(LayoutErr { private: () })?;
let alloc_size = padded_size.checked_mul(n)
.ok_or(LayoutErr { private: () })?;
2018-06-02 09:11:57 -05:00
unsafe {
// self.align is already known to be valid and alloc_size has been
// padded already.
Ok((Layout::from_size_align_unchecked(alloc_size, self.align()), padded_size))
}
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// Creates a layout describing the record for `self` followed by
/// `next`, including any necessary padding to ensure that `next`
/// will be properly aligned. Note that the result layout will
/// satisfy the alignment properties of both `self` and `next`.
///
/// The resulting layout will be the same as that of a C struct containing
/// two fields with the layouts of `self` and `next`, in that order.
///
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// Returns `Some((k, offset))`, where `k` is layout of the concatenated
/// record and `offset` is the relative location, in bytes, of the
2017-08-11 13:34:14 -05:00
/// start of the `next` embedded within the concatenated record
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// (assuming that the record itself starts at offset 0).
///
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// On arithmetic overflow, returns `LayoutErr`.
#[unstable(feature = "alloc_layout_extra", issue = "55724")]
2018-06-02 09:11:57 -05:00
#[inline]
pub fn extend(&self, next: Self) -> Result<(Self, usize), LayoutErr> {
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
let new_align = cmp::max(self.align(), next.align());
2018-06-02 09:11:57 -05:00
let pad = self.padding_needed_for(next.align());
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
let offset = self.size().checked_add(pad)
.ok_or(LayoutErr { private: () })?;
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
let new_size = offset.checked_add(next.size())
.ok_or(LayoutErr { private: () })?;
let layout = Layout::from_size_align(new_size, new_align)?;
Ok((layout, offset))
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// Creates a layout describing the record for `n` instances of
/// `self`, with no padding between each instance.
///
/// Note that, unlike `repeat`, `repeat_packed` does not guarantee
/// that the repeated instances of `self` will be properly
/// aligned, even if a given instance of `self` is properly
/// aligned. In other words, if the layout returned by
/// `repeat_packed` is used to allocate an array, it is not
/// guaranteed that all elements in the array will be properly
/// aligned.
///
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// On arithmetic overflow, returns `LayoutErr`.
#[unstable(feature = "alloc_layout_extra", issue = "55724")]
2018-06-02 09:11:57 -05:00
#[inline]
pub fn repeat_packed(&self, n: usize) -> Result<Self, LayoutErr> {
let size = self.size().checked_mul(n).ok_or(LayoutErr { private: () })?;
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
Layout::from_size_align(size, self.align())
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// Creates a layout describing the record for `self` followed by
/// `next` with no additional padding between the two. Since no
/// padding is inserted, the alignment of `next` is irrelevant,
2017-08-15 14:45:21 -05:00
/// and is not incorporated *at all* into the resulting layout.
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// On arithmetic overflow, returns `LayoutErr`.
#[unstable(feature = "alloc_layout_extra", issue = "55724")]
2018-06-02 09:11:57 -05:00
#[inline]
pub fn extend_packed(&self, next: Self) -> Result<Self, LayoutErr> {
let new_size = self.size().checked_add(next.size())
.ok_or(LayoutErr { private: () })?;
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
let layout = Layout::from_size_align(new_size, self.align())?;
Ok(layout)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// Creates a layout describing the record for a `[T; n]`.
///
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
/// On arithmetic overflow, returns `LayoutErr`.
#[unstable(feature = "alloc_layout_extra", issue = "55724")]
2018-06-02 09:11:57 -05:00
#[inline]
pub fn array<T>(n: usize) -> Result<Self, LayoutErr> {
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
Layout::new::<T>()
.repeat(n)
.map(|(k, offs)| {
debug_assert!(offs == mem::size_of::<T>());
k
})
}
}
/// The parameters given to `Layout::from_size_align`
/// or some other `Layout` constructor
/// do not satisfy its documented constraints.
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
pub struct LayoutErr {
private: ()
}
// (we need this for downstream impl of trait Error)
#[stable(feature = "alloc_layout", since = "1.28.0")]
impl fmt::Display for LayoutErr {
2019-04-18 18:37:12 -05:00
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
f.write_str("invalid parameters to Layout::from_size_align")
}
}
/// The `AllocErr` error indicates an allocation failure
/// that may be due to resource exhaustion or to
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// something wrong when combining the given input arguments with this
/// allocator.
#[unstable(feature = "allocator_api", issue = "32838")]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
2018-04-03 08:41:09 -05:00
pub struct AllocErr;
// (we need this for downstream impl of trait Error)
#[unstable(feature = "allocator_api", issue = "32838")]
impl fmt::Display for AllocErr {
2019-04-18 18:37:12 -05:00
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
2018-04-03 08:41:09 -05:00
f.write_str("memory allocation failed")
}
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
/// The `CannotReallocInPlace` error is used when `grow_in_place` or
/// `shrink_in_place` were unable to reuse the given memory block for
/// a requested layout.
#[unstable(feature = "allocator_api", issue = "32838")]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
pub struct CannotReallocInPlace;
#[unstable(feature = "allocator_api", issue = "32838")]
impl CannotReallocInPlace {
pub fn description(&self) -> &str {
"cannot reallocate allocator's memory in place"
}
}
// (we need this for downstream impl of trait Error)
#[unstable(feature = "allocator_api", issue = "32838")]
impl fmt::Display for CannotReallocInPlace {
2019-04-18 18:37:12 -05:00
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
write!(f, "{}", self.description())
}
}
/// A memory allocator that can be registered as the standard librarys default
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
/// though the `#[global_allocator]` attributes.
///
/// Some of the methods require that a memory block be *currently
/// allocated* via an allocator. This means that:
///
/// * the starting address for that memory block was previously
/// returned by a previous call to an allocation method
/// such as `alloc`, and
///
/// * the memory block has not been subsequently deallocated, where
/// blocks are deallocated either by being passed to a deallocation
/// method such as `dealloc` or by being
/// passed to a reallocation method that returns a non-null pointer.
///
///
/// # Example
///
/// ```no_run
/// use std::alloc::{GlobalAlloc, Layout, alloc};
/// use std::ptr::null_mut;
///
/// struct MyAllocator;
///
/// unsafe impl GlobalAlloc for MyAllocator {
/// unsafe fn alloc(&self, _layout: Layout) -> *mut u8 { null_mut() }
/// unsafe fn dealloc(&self, _ptr: *mut u8, _layout: Layout) {}
/// }
///
/// #[global_allocator]
/// static A: MyAllocator = MyAllocator;
///
/// fn main() {
/// unsafe {
/// assert!(alloc(Layout::new::<u32>()).is_null())
/// }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// # Safety
///
/// The `GlobalAlloc` trait is an `unsafe` trait for a number of reasons, and
/// implementors must ensure that they adhere to these contracts:
///
2019-02-09 15:23:30 -06:00
/// * It's undefined behavior if global allocators unwind. This restriction may
/// be lifted in the future, but currently a panic from any of these
/// functions may lead to memory unsafety.
///
/// * `Layout` queries and calculations in general must be correct. Callers of
/// this trait are allowed to rely on the contracts defined on each method,
/// and implementors must ensure such contracts remain true.
#[stable(feature = "global_alloc", since = "1.28.0")]
2018-04-03 07:07:06 -05:00
pub unsafe trait GlobalAlloc {
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
/// Allocate memory as described by the given `layout`.
///
/// Returns a pointer to newly-allocated memory,
/// or null to indicate allocation failure.
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure that `layout` has non-zero size.
///
/// (Extension subtraits might provide more specific bounds on
/// behavior, e.g., guarantee a sentinel address or a null pointer
/// in response to a zero-size allocation request.)
///
/// The allocated block of memory may or may not be initialized.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning a null pointer indicates that either memory is exhausted
/// or `layout` does not meet allocator's size or alignment constraints.
///
/// Implementations are encouraged to return null on memory
/// exhaustion rather than aborting, but this is not
/// a strict requirement. (Specifically: it is *legal* to
/// implement this trait atop an underlying native allocation
/// library that aborts on memory exhaustion.)
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to an
/// allocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
#[stable(feature = "global_alloc", since = "1.28.0")]
unsafe fn alloc(&self, layout: Layout) -> *mut u8;
2018-04-03 07:07:06 -05:00
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
/// Deallocate the block of memory at the given `ptr` pointer with the given `layout`.
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure all of the following:
///
/// * `ptr` must denote a block of memory currently allocated via
/// this allocator,
///
/// * `layout` must be the same layout that was used
/// to allocated that block of memory,
#[stable(feature = "global_alloc", since = "1.28.0")]
unsafe fn dealloc(&self, ptr: *mut u8, layout: Layout);
2018-04-03 07:07:06 -05:00
/// Behaves like `alloc`, but also ensures that the contents
/// are set to zero before being returned.
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This function is unsafe for the same reasons that `alloc` is.
/// However the allocated block of memory is guaranteed to be initialized.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning a null pointer indicates that either memory is exhausted
/// or `layout` does not meet allocator's size or alignment constraints,
/// just as in `alloc`.
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to an
/// allocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
#[stable(feature = "global_alloc", since = "1.28.0")]
unsafe fn alloc_zeroed(&self, layout: Layout) -> *mut u8 {
2018-04-03 07:07:06 -05:00
let size = layout.size();
let ptr = self.alloc(layout);
if !ptr.is_null() {
ptr::write_bytes(ptr, 0, size);
2018-04-03 07:07:06 -05:00
}
ptr
}
2018-11-10 06:31:49 -06:00
/// Shrink or grow a block of memory to the given `new_size`.
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
/// The block is described by the given `ptr` pointer and `layout`.
///
/// If this returns a non-null pointer, then ownership of the memory block
2018-10-22 11:21:55 -05:00
/// referenced by `ptr` has been transferred to this allocator.
/// The memory may or may not have been deallocated,
/// and should be considered unusable (unless of course it was
/// transferred back to the caller again via the return value of
/// this method).
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
///
/// If this method returns null, then ownership of the memory
/// block has not been transferred to this allocator, and the
/// contents of the memory block are unaltered.
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
///
2018-04-03 10:51:03 -05:00
/// # Safety
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure all of the following:
///
/// * `ptr` must be currently allocated via this allocator,
///
/// * `layout` must be the same layout that was used
/// to allocated that block of memory,
///
/// * `new_size` must be greater than zero.
///
/// * `new_size`, when rounded up to the nearest multiple of `layout.align()`,
/// must not overflow (i.e., the rounded value must be less than `usize::MAX`).
///
/// (Extension subtraits might provide more specific bounds on
/// behavior, e.g., guarantee a sentinel address or a null pointer
/// in response to a zero-size allocation request.)
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns null if the new layout does not meet the size
/// and alignment constraints of the allocator, or if reallocation
/// otherwise fails.
///
/// Implementations are encouraged to return null on memory
/// exhaustion rather than panicking or aborting, but this is not
/// a strict requirement. (Specifically: it is *legal* to
/// implement this trait atop an underlying native allocation
/// library that aborts on memory exhaustion.)
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to a
/// reallocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
#[stable(feature = "global_alloc", since = "1.28.0")]
unsafe fn realloc(&self, ptr: *mut u8, layout: Layout, new_size: usize) -> *mut u8 {
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
let new_layout = Layout::from_size_align_unchecked(new_size, layout.align());
2018-04-03 07:07:06 -05:00
let new_ptr = self.alloc(new_layout);
if !new_ptr.is_null() {
ptr::copy_nonoverlapping(
ptr,
new_ptr,
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
cmp::min(layout.size(), new_size),
2018-04-03 07:07:06 -05:00
);
2018-04-11 13:16:45 -05:00
self.dealloc(ptr, layout);
2018-04-03 07:07:06 -05:00
}
new_ptr
}
}
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// An implementation of `Alloc` can allocate, reallocate, and
/// deallocate arbitrary blocks of data described via `Layout`.
///
/// Some of the methods require that a memory block be *currently
/// allocated* via an allocator. This means that:
///
/// * the starting address for that memory block was previously
/// returned by a previous call to an allocation method (`alloc`,
/// `alloc_zeroed`, `alloc_excess`, `alloc_one`, `alloc_array`) or
/// reallocation method (`realloc`, `realloc_excess`, or
/// `realloc_array`), and
///
/// * the memory block has not been subsequently deallocated, where
/// blocks are deallocated either by being passed to a deallocation
/// method (`dealloc`, `dealloc_one`, `dealloc_array`) or by being
/// passed to a reallocation method (see above) that returns `Ok`.
///
/// A note regarding zero-sized types and zero-sized layouts: many
/// methods in the `Alloc` trait state that allocation requests
/// must be non-zero size, or else undefined behavior can result.
///
/// * However, some higher-level allocation methods (`alloc_one`,
/// `alloc_array`) are well-defined on zero-sized types and can
/// optionally support them: it is left up to the implementor
/// whether to return `Err`, or to return `Ok` with some pointer.
///
/// * If an `Alloc` implementation chooses to return `Ok` in this
/// case (i.e., the pointer denotes a zero-sized inaccessible block)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// then that returned pointer must be considered "currently
/// allocated". On such an allocator, *all* methods that take
/// currently-allocated pointers as inputs must accept these
/// zero-sized pointers, *without* causing undefined behavior.
///
/// * In other words, if a zero-sized pointer can flow out of an
/// allocator, then that allocator must likewise accept that pointer
/// flowing back into its deallocation and reallocation methods.
///
/// Some of the methods require that a layout *fit* a memory block.
/// What it means for a layout to "fit" a memory block means (or
/// equivalently, for a memory block to "fit" a layout) is that the
/// following two conditions must hold:
///
/// 1. The block's starting address must be aligned to `layout.align()`.
///
/// 2. The block's size must fall in the range `[use_min, use_max]`, where:
///
/// * `use_min` is `self.usable_size(layout).0`, and
///
/// * `use_max` is the capacity that was (or would have been)
/// returned when (if) the block was allocated via a call to
/// `alloc_excess` or `realloc_excess`.
///
/// Note that:
///
/// * the size of the layout most recently used to allocate the block
/// is guaranteed to be in the range `[use_min, use_max]`, and
///
/// * a lower-bound on `use_max` can be safely approximated by a call to
/// `usable_size`.
///
/// * if a layout `k` fits a memory block (denoted by `ptr`)
/// currently allocated via an allocator `a`, then it is legal to
/// use that layout to deallocate it, i.e., `a.dealloc(ptr, k);`.
///
/// # Safety
///
/// The `Alloc` trait is an `unsafe` trait for a number of reasons, and
/// implementors must ensure that they adhere to these contracts:
///
/// * Pointers returned from allocation functions must point to valid memory and
/// retain their validity until at least the instance of `Alloc` is dropped
/// itself.
///
/// * `Layout` queries and calculations in general must be correct. Callers of
/// this trait are allowed to rely on the contracts defined on each method,
/// and implementors must ensure such contracts remain true.
///
/// Note that this list may get tweaked over time as clarifications are made in
/// the future.
#[unstable(feature = "allocator_api", issue = "32838")]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
pub unsafe trait Alloc {
// (Note: some existing allocators have unspecified but well-defined
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
// behavior in response to a zero size allocation request ;
// e.g., in C, `malloc` of 0 will either return a null pointer or a
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
// unique pointer, but will not have arbitrary undefined
// behavior.
// However in jemalloc for example,
// `mallocx(0)` is documented as undefined behavior.)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// Returns a pointer meeting the size and alignment guarantees of
/// `layout`.
///
/// If this method returns an `Ok(addr)`, then the `addr` returned
/// will be non-null address pointing to a block of storage
/// suitable for holding an instance of `layout`.
///
/// The returned block of storage may or may not have its contents
/// initialized. (Extension subtraits might restrict this
/// behavior, e.g., to ensure initialization to particular sets of
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// bit patterns.)
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure that `layout` has non-zero size.
///
/// (Extension subtraits might provide more specific bounds on
/// behavior, e.g., guarantee a sentinel address or a null pointer
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// in response to a zero-size allocation request.)
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning `Err` indicates that either memory is exhausted or
/// `layout` does not meet allocator's size or alignment
/// constraints.
///
/// Implementations are encouraged to return `Err` on memory
/// exhaustion rather than panicking or aborting, but this is not
/// a strict requirement. (Specifically: it is *legal* to
/// implement this trait atop an underlying native allocation
/// library that aborts on memory exhaustion.)
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to an
/// allocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
unsafe fn alloc(&mut self, layout: Layout) -> Result<NonNull<u8>, AllocErr>;
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// Deallocate the memory referenced by `ptr`.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure all of the following:
///
/// * `ptr` must denote a block of memory currently allocated via
/// this allocator,
///
/// * `layout` must *fit* that block of memory,
///
/// * In addition to fitting the block of memory `layout`, the
/// alignment of the `layout` must match the alignment used
/// to allocate that block of memory.
unsafe fn dealloc(&mut self, ptr: NonNull<u8>, layout: Layout);
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
// == ALLOCATOR-SPECIFIC QUANTITIES AND LIMITS ==
// usable_size
/// Returns bounds on the guaranteed usable size of a successful
/// allocation created with the specified `layout`.
///
/// In particular, if one has a memory block allocated via a given
/// allocator `a` and layout `k` where `a.usable_size(k)` returns
/// `(l, u)`, then one can pass that block to `a.dealloc()` with a
/// layout in the size range [l, u].
///
/// (All implementors of `usable_size` must ensure that
/// `l <= k.size() <= u`)
///
/// Both the lower- and upper-bounds (`l` and `u` respectively)
/// are provided, because an allocator based on size classes could
/// misbehave if one attempts to deallocate a block without
/// providing a correct value for its size (i.e., one within the
/// range `[l, u]`).
///
/// Clients who wish to make use of excess capacity are encouraged
/// to use the `alloc_excess` and `realloc_excess` instead, as
/// this method is constrained to report conservative values that
/// serve as valid bounds for *all possible* allocation method
/// calls.
///
/// However, for clients that do not wish to track the capacity
/// returned by `alloc_excess` locally, this method is likely to
/// produce useful results.
#[inline]
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
fn usable_size(&self, layout: &Layout) -> (usize, usize) {
(layout.size(), layout.size())
}
// == METHODS FOR MEMORY REUSE ==
// realloc. alloc_excess, realloc_excess
/// Returns a pointer suitable for holding data described by
2018-11-10 06:31:49 -06:00
/// a new layout with `layout`s alignment and a size given
/// by `new_size`. To
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// accomplish this, this may extend or shrink the allocation
/// referenced by `ptr` to fit the new layout.
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// If this returns `Ok`, then ownership of the memory block
/// referenced by `ptr` has been transferred to this
/// allocator. The memory may or may not have been freed, and
/// should be considered unusable (unless of course it was
/// transferred back to the caller again via the return value of
/// this method).
///
/// If this method returns `Err`, then ownership of the memory
/// block has not been transferred to this allocator, and the
/// contents of the memory block are unaltered.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure all of the following:
///
/// * `ptr` must be currently allocated via this allocator,
///
/// * `layout` must *fit* the `ptr` (see above). (The `new_size`
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// argument need not fit it.)
///
/// * `new_size` must be greater than zero.
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// * `new_size`, when rounded up to the nearest multiple of `layout.align()`,
/// must not overflow (i.e., the rounded value must be less than `usize::MAX`).
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// (Extension subtraits might provide more specific bounds on
/// behavior, e.g., guarantee a sentinel address or a null pointer
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// in response to a zero-size allocation request.)
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns `Err` only if the new layout
/// does not meet the allocator's size
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// and alignment constraints of the allocator, or if reallocation
/// otherwise fails.
///
/// Implementations are encouraged to return `Err` on memory
/// exhaustion rather than panicking or aborting, but this is not
/// a strict requirement. (Specifically: it is *legal* to
/// implement this trait atop an underlying native allocation
/// library that aborts on memory exhaustion.)
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to a
/// reallocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
unsafe fn realloc(&mut self,
ptr: NonNull<u8>,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
layout: Layout,
new_size: usize) -> Result<NonNull<u8>, AllocErr> {
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
let old_size = layout.size();
if new_size >= old_size {
if let Ok(()) = self.grow_in_place(ptr, layout.clone(), new_size) {
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
return Ok(ptr);
}
} else if new_size < old_size {
if let Ok(()) = self.shrink_in_place(ptr, layout.clone(), new_size) {
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
return Ok(ptr);
}
}
// otherwise, fall back on alloc + copy + dealloc.
let new_layout = Layout::from_size_align_unchecked(new_size, layout.align());
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
let result = self.alloc(new_layout);
if let Ok(new_ptr) = result {
ptr::copy_nonoverlapping(ptr.as_ptr(),
new_ptr.as_ptr(),
cmp::min(old_size, new_size));
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
self.dealloc(ptr, layout);
}
result
}
/// Behaves like `alloc`, but also ensures that the contents
/// are set to zero before being returned.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe for the same reasons that `alloc` is.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning `Err` indicates that either memory is exhausted or
/// `layout` does not meet allocator's size or alignment
/// constraints, just as in `alloc`.
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to an
/// allocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
unsafe fn alloc_zeroed(&mut self, layout: Layout) -> Result<NonNull<u8>, AllocErr> {
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
let size = layout.size();
let p = self.alloc(layout);
if let Ok(p) = p {
ptr::write_bytes(p.as_ptr(), 0, size);
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
p
}
/// Behaves like `alloc`, but also returns the whole size of
/// the returned block. For some `layout` inputs, like arrays, this
/// may include extra storage usable for additional data.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe for the same reasons that `alloc` is.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning `Err` indicates that either memory is exhausted or
/// `layout` does not meet allocator's size or alignment
/// constraints, just as in `alloc`.
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to an
/// allocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
unsafe fn alloc_excess(&mut self, layout: Layout) -> Result<Excess, AllocErr> {
let usable_size = self.usable_size(&layout);
self.alloc(layout).map(|p| Excess(p, usable_size.1))
}
/// Behaves like `realloc`, but also returns the whole size of
/// the returned block. For some `layout` inputs, like arrays, this
/// may include extra storage usable for additional data.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe for the same reasons that `realloc` is.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning `Err` indicates that either memory is exhausted or
/// `layout` does not meet allocator's size or alignment
/// constraints, just as in `realloc`.
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to a
/// reallocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
unsafe fn realloc_excess(&mut self,
ptr: NonNull<u8>,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
layout: Layout,
new_size: usize) -> Result<Excess, AllocErr> {
let new_layout = Layout::from_size_align_unchecked(new_size, layout.align());
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
let usable_size = self.usable_size(&new_layout);
self.realloc(ptr, layout, new_size)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
.map(|p| Excess(p, usable_size.1))
}
/// Attempts to extend the allocation referenced by `ptr` to fit `new_size`.
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// If this returns `Ok`, then the allocator has asserted that the
/// memory block referenced by `ptr` now fits `new_size`, and thus can
/// be used to carry data of a layout of that size and same alignment as
/// `layout`. (The allocator is allowed to
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// expend effort to accomplish this, such as extending the memory block to
/// include successor blocks, or virtual memory tricks.)
///
/// Regardless of what this method returns, ownership of the
/// memory block referenced by `ptr` has not been transferred, and
/// the contents of the memory block are unaltered.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure all of the following:
///
/// * `ptr` must be currently allocated via this allocator,
///
/// * `layout` must *fit* the `ptr` (see above); note the
/// `new_size` argument need not fit it,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// * `new_size` must not be less than `layout.size()`,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns `Err(CannotReallocInPlace)` when the allocator is
/// unable to assert that the memory block referenced by `ptr`
/// could fit `layout`.
///
/// Note that one cannot pass `CannotReallocInPlace` to the `handle_alloc_error`
/// function; clients are expected either to be able to recover from
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// `grow_in_place` failures without aborting, or to fall back on
/// another reallocation method before resorting to an abort.
unsafe fn grow_in_place(&mut self,
ptr: NonNull<u8>,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
layout: Layout,
new_size: usize) -> Result<(), CannotReallocInPlace> {
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
let _ = ptr; // this default implementation doesn't care about the actual address.
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
debug_assert!(new_size >= layout.size());
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
let (_l, u) = self.usable_size(&layout);
// _l <= layout.size() [guaranteed by usable_size()]
// layout.size() <= new_layout.size() [required by this method]
if new_size <= u {
Ok(())
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
} else {
Err(CannotReallocInPlace)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
}
/// Attempts to shrink the allocation referenced by `ptr` to fit `new_size`.
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// If this returns `Ok`, then the allocator has asserted that the
/// memory block referenced by `ptr` now fits `new_size`, and
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// thus can only be used to carry data of that smaller
/// layout. (The allocator is allowed to take advantage of this,
/// carving off portions of the block for reuse elsewhere.) The
/// truncated contents of the block within the smaller layout are
/// unaltered, and ownership of block has not been transferred.
///
/// If this returns `Err`, then the memory block is considered to
/// still represent the original (larger) `layout`. None of the
/// block has been carved off for reuse elsewhere, ownership of
/// the memory block has not been transferred, and the contents of
/// the memory block are unaltered.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure all of the following:
///
/// * `ptr` must be currently allocated via this allocator,
///
/// * `layout` must *fit* the `ptr` (see above); note the
/// `new_size` argument need not fit it,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// * `new_size` must not be greater than `layout.size()`
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// (and must be greater than zero),
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns `Err(CannotReallocInPlace)` when the allocator is
/// unable to assert that the memory block referenced by `ptr`
/// could fit `layout`.
///
/// Note that one cannot pass `CannotReallocInPlace` to the `handle_alloc_error`
/// function; clients are expected either to be able to recover from
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
/// `shrink_in_place` failures without aborting, or to fall back
/// on another reallocation method before resorting to an abort.
unsafe fn shrink_in_place(&mut self,
ptr: NonNull<u8>,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
layout: Layout,
new_size: usize) -> Result<(), CannotReallocInPlace> {
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
let _ = ptr; // this default implementation doesn't care about the actual address.
2018-05-30 14:00:37 -05:00
debug_assert!(new_size <= layout.size());
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
let (l, _u) = self.usable_size(&layout);
// layout.size() <= _u [guaranteed by usable_size()]
// new_layout.size() <= layout.size() [required by this method]
if l <= new_size {
Ok(())
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
} else {
Err(CannotReallocInPlace)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
}
// == COMMON USAGE PATTERNS ==
// alloc_one, dealloc_one, alloc_array, realloc_array. dealloc_array
/// Allocates a block suitable for holding an instance of `T`.
///
/// Captures a common usage pattern for allocators.
///
/// The returned block is suitable for passing to the
/// `alloc`/`realloc` methods of this allocator.
///
/// Note to implementors: If this returns `Ok(ptr)`, then `ptr`
/// must be considered "currently allocated" and must be
/// acceptable input to methods such as `realloc` or `dealloc`,
/// *even if* `T` is a zero-sized type. In other words, if your
/// `Alloc` implementation overrides this method in a manner
/// that can return a zero-sized `ptr`, then all reallocation and
/// deallocation methods need to be similarly overridden to accept
/// such values as input.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning `Err` indicates that either memory is exhausted or
/// `T` does not meet allocator's size or alignment constraints.
///
/// For zero-sized `T`, may return either of `Ok` or `Err`, but
/// will *not* yield undefined behavior.
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to an
/// allocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
fn alloc_one<T>(&mut self) -> Result<NonNull<T>, AllocErr>
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
where Self: Sized
{
let k = Layout::new::<T>();
if k.size() > 0 {
unsafe { self.alloc(k).map(|p| p.cast()) }
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
} else {
2018-04-03 08:41:09 -05:00
Err(AllocErr)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
}
/// Deallocates a block suitable for holding an instance of `T`.
///
/// The given block must have been produced by this allocator,
/// and must be suitable for storing a `T` (in terms of alignment
/// as well as minimum and maximum size); otherwise yields
/// undefined behavior.
///
/// Captures a common usage pattern for allocators.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure both:
///
/// * `ptr` must denote a block of memory currently allocated via this allocator
///
/// * the layout of `T` must *fit* that block of memory.
unsafe fn dealloc_one<T>(&mut self, ptr: NonNull<T>)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
where Self: Sized
{
let k = Layout::new::<T>();
if k.size() > 0 {
self.dealloc(ptr.cast(), k);
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
}
/// Allocates a block suitable for holding `n` instances of `T`.
///
/// Captures a common usage pattern for allocators.
///
/// The returned block is suitable for passing to the
/// `alloc`/`realloc` methods of this allocator.
///
/// Note to implementors: If this returns `Ok(ptr)`, then `ptr`
/// must be considered "currently allocated" and must be
/// acceptable input to methods such as `realloc` or `dealloc`,
/// *even if* `T` is a zero-sized type. In other words, if your
/// `Alloc` implementation overrides this method in a manner
/// that can return a zero-sized `ptr`, then all reallocation and
/// deallocation methods need to be similarly overridden to accept
/// such values as input.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning `Err` indicates that either memory is exhausted or
/// `[T; n]` does not meet allocator's size or alignment
/// constraints.
///
/// For zero-sized `T` or `n == 0`, may return either of `Ok` or
/// `Err`, but will *not* yield undefined behavior.
///
/// Always returns `Err` on arithmetic overflow.
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to an
/// allocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
fn alloc_array<T>(&mut self, n: usize) -> Result<NonNull<T>, AllocErr>
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
where Self: Sized
{
match Layout::array::<T>(n) {
Ok(ref layout) if layout.size() > 0 => {
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
unsafe {
self.alloc(layout.clone()).map(|p| p.cast())
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
}
2018-04-03 08:41:09 -05:00
_ => Err(AllocErr),
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
}
/// Reallocates a block previously suitable for holding `n_old`
/// instances of `T`, returning a block suitable for holding
/// `n_new` instances of `T`.
///
/// Captures a common usage pattern for allocators.
///
/// The returned block is suitable for passing to the
/// `alloc`/`realloc` methods of this allocator.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure all of the following:
///
/// * `ptr` must be currently allocated via this allocator,
///
/// * the layout of `[T; n_old]` must *fit* that block of memory.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning `Err` indicates that either memory is exhausted or
/// `[T; n_new]` does not meet allocator's size or alignment
/// constraints.
///
/// For zero-sized `T` or `n_new == 0`, may return either of `Ok` or
/// `Err`, but will *not* yield undefined behavior.
///
/// Always returns `Err` on arithmetic overflow.
///
/// Clients wishing to abort computation in response to a
/// reallocation error are encouraged to call the [`handle_alloc_error`] function,
/// rather than directly invoking `panic!` or similar.
2018-06-01 02:18:25 -05:00
///
/// [`handle_alloc_error`]: ../../alloc/alloc/fn.handle_alloc_error.html
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
unsafe fn realloc_array<T>(&mut self,
ptr: NonNull<T>,
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
n_old: usize,
n_new: usize) -> Result<NonNull<T>, AllocErr>
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
where Self: Sized
{
match (Layout::array::<T>(n_old), Layout::array::<T>(n_new)) {
(Ok(ref k_old), Ok(ref k_new)) if k_old.size() > 0 && k_new.size() > 0 => {
debug_assert!(k_old.align() == k_new.align());
self.realloc(ptr.cast(), k_old.clone(), k_new.size()).map(NonNull::cast)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
_ => {
2018-04-03 08:41:09 -05:00
Err(AllocErr)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
}
}
/// Deallocates a block suitable for holding `n` instances of `T`.
///
/// Captures a common usage pattern for allocators.
///
/// # Safety
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
///
/// This function is unsafe because undefined behavior can result
/// if the caller does not ensure both:
///
/// * `ptr` must denote a block of memory currently allocated via this allocator
///
/// * the layout of `[T; n]` must *fit* that block of memory.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returning `Err` indicates that either `[T; n]` or the given
/// memory block does not meet allocator's size or alignment
/// constraints.
///
/// Always returns `Err` on arithmetic overflow.
unsafe fn dealloc_array<T>(&mut self, ptr: NonNull<T>, n: usize) -> Result<(), AllocErr>
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
where Self: Sized
{
match Layout::array::<T>(n) {
Ok(ref k) if k.size() > 0 => {
Ok(self.dealloc(ptr.cast(), k.clone()))
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
_ => {
2018-04-03 08:41:09 -05:00
Err(AllocErr)
Add API for `Alloc` trait. Includes `alloc_zeroed` method that `RawVec` has come to depend on. Exposed private `Layout::from_size_align` ctor to be `pub`, and added explicit conditions for when it will panic (namely, when `align` is not power-of-two, or if rounding up `size` to a multiple of `align` overflows). Normalized all `Layout` construction to go through `Layout::from_size_align`. Addressed review feedback regarding `struct Layout` and zero-sized layouts. Restrict specification for `dealloc`, adding additional constraint that the given alignment has to match that used to allocate the block. (This is a maximally conservative constraint on the alignment. An open question to resolve (before stabilization) is whether we can return to a looser constraint such as the one previously specified.) Split `fn realloc_in_place` into separate `fn grow_in_place` and `fn shrink_in_place` methods, which have default impls that check against usable_size for reuse. Make `realloc` default impl try `grow_in_place` or `shrink_in_place` as appropriate before fallback on alloc+copy+dealloc. Drive-by: When reviewing calls to `padding_needed_for`, discovered what I think was an over-conservative choice for its argument alignment. Namely, in `fn extend`, we automatically realign the whole resulting layout to satisfy both old (self) and new alignments. When the old alignment exceeds the new, this means we would insert unnecessary padding. So I changed the code to pass in `next.align` instead of `new_align` to `padding_needed_for`. Replaced ref to `realloc_in_place` with `grow_in_place`/`shrink_in_place`. Revised docs replacing my idiosyncratic style of `fn foo` with just `foo` when referring to the function or method `foo`. (Alpha-renamed `Allocator` to `Alloc`.) Post-rebased, added `Debug` derive for `allocator::Excess` to satisfy `missing_debug_implementations`.
2017-05-23 07:47:09 -05:00
}
}
}
}