mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
master
rust/tests/ui/fmt/respanned-literal-issue-106191.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

20 lines
864 B
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Normal View History

Remove `'apostrophes'` from `rustc_parse_format`
2024-10-14 16:22:51 -05:00
error: invalid format string: expected `}` but string was terminated
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-01-05 13:17:30 -06:00
--> $DIR/respanned-literal-issue-106191.rs:6:65
|
LL | format_string_proc_macro::respan_to_invalid_format_literal!("¡");
Remove `'apostrophes'` from `rustc_parse_format`
2024-10-14 16:22:51 -05:00
| ^^^ expected `}` in format string
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-01-05 13:17:30 -06:00
|
= note: if you intended to print `{`, you can escape it using `{{`
Remove `'apostrophes'` from `rustc_parse_format`
2024-10-14 16:22:51 -05:00
error: invalid format string: expected `}` but string was terminated
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-01-05 13:17:30 -06:00
--> $DIR/respanned-literal-issue-106191.rs:8:18
|
LL | format_args!(r#concat!("¡ {"));
Remove `'apostrophes'` from `rustc_parse_format`
2024-10-14 16:22:51 -05:00
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `}` in format string
Properly allow macro expanded `format_args` invocations to uses captures Originally, this was kinda half-allowed. There were some primitive checks in place that looked at the span to see whether the input was likely a literal. These "source literal" checks are needed because the spans created during `format_args` parsing only make sense when it is indeed a literal that was written in the source code directly. This is orthogonal to the restriction that the first argument must be a "direct literal", not being exanpanded from macros. This restriction was imposed by [RFC 2795] on the basis of being too confusing. But this was only concerned with the argument of the invocation being a literal, not whether it was a source literal (maybe in spirit it meant it being a source literal, this is not clear to me). Since the original check only really cared about source literals (which is good enough to deny the `format_args!(concat!())` example), macros expanding to `format_args` invocations were able to use implicit captures if they spanned the string in a way that lead back to a source string. The "source literal" checks were not strict enough and caused ICEs in certain cases (see # 106191 (the space is intended to avoid spammy backreferences)). So I tightened it up in # 106195 to really only work if it's a direct source literal. This caused the `indoc` crate to break. `indoc` transformed the source literal by removing whitespace, which made it not a "source literal" anymore (which is required to fix the ICE). But since `indoc` spanned the literal in ways that made the old check think that it's a literal, it was able to use implicit captures (which is useful and nice for the users of `indoc`). This commit properly seperates the previously introduced concepts of "source literal" and "direct literal" and therefore allows `indoc` invocations, which don't create "source literals" to use implicit captures again. [RFC 2795]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2795-format-args-implicit-identifiers.html#macro-hygiene
2023-01-05 13:17:30 -06:00
|
= note: if you intended to print `{`, you can escape it using `{{`
= note: this error originates in the macro `concat` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink